[v1,2/3] drm/amd/pm: send the SMT-enable message to pmfw
Limonciello, Mario
mario.limonciello at amd.com
Thu Mar 23 17:41:30 UTC 2023
On 3/22/2023 00:48, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> When the CPU SMT status change in the fly, sent the SMT-enable
> message to pmfw to notify it that the SMT status changed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wenyou Yang <WenYou.Yang at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h | 5 +++
> 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> index b5d64749990e..5cd85a9d149d 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/amdgpu_smu.c
> @@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
>
> #define SWSMU_CODE_LAYER_L1
>
> +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> #include <linux/firmware.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
>
> @@ -69,6 +70,14 @@ static int smu_set_fan_speed_rpm(void *handle, uint32_t speed);
> static int smu_set_gfx_cgpg(struct smu_context *smu, bool enabled);
> static int smu_set_mp1_state(void *handle, enum pp_mp1_state mp1_state);
>
> +static int smt_notifier_callback(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long action, void *data);
> +
> +extern struct raw_notifier_head smt_notifier_head;
> +
> +static struct notifier_block smt_notifier = {
> + .notifier_call = smt_notifier_callback,
> +};
> +
> static int smu_sys_get_pp_feature_mask(void *handle,
> char *buf)
> {
> @@ -625,6 +634,8 @@ static int smu_set_funcs(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static struct smu_context *current_smu;
> +
> static int smu_early_init(void *handle)
> {
> struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)handle;
> @@ -645,6 +656,7 @@ static int smu_early_init(void *handle)
> mutex_init(&smu->message_lock);
>
> adev->powerplay.pp_handle = smu;
> + current_smu = smu;
> adev->powerplay.pp_funcs = &swsmu_pm_funcs;
>
> r = smu_set_funcs(adev);
> @@ -1105,6 +1117,8 @@ static int smu_sw_init(void *handle)
> if (!smu->ppt_funcs->get_fan_control_mode)
> smu->adev->pm.no_fan = true;
>
> + raw_notifier_chain_register(&smt_notifier_head, &smt_notifier);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1122,6 +1136,8 @@ static int smu_sw_fini(void *handle)
>
> smu_fini_microcode(smu);
>
> + raw_notifier_chain_unregister(&smt_notifier_head, &smt_notifier);
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -3241,3 +3257,28 @@ int smu_send_hbm_bad_channel_flag(struct smu_context *smu, uint32_t size)
>
> return ret;
> }
> +
> +static int smu_set_cpu_smt_enable(struct smu_context *smu, bool enable)
> +{
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> +
> + if (smu->ppt_funcs && smu->ppt_funcs->set_cpu_smt_enable)
> + ret = smu->ppt_funcs->set_cpu_smt_enable(smu, enable);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int smt_notifier_callback(struct notifier_block *nb,
> + unsigned long action, void *data)
> +{
> + struct smu_context *smu = current_smu;
> + int ret = NOTIFY_OK;
This initialization is pointless, it's clobbered in the next line.
> +
> + ret = (action == SMT_ENABLED) ?
> + smu_set_cpu_smt_enable(smu, true) :
> + smu_set_cpu_smt_enable(smu, false);
How about this instead, it should be more readable:
ret = smu_set_cpu_smt_enable(smu, action == SMT_ENABLED);
> + if (ret)
> + ret = NOTIFY_BAD;
> +
> + return ret;
How about instead:
dev_dbg(adev->dev, "failed to %sable SMT: %d\n", action == SMT_ENABLED
? "en" : "dis", ret);
return ret ? NOTIFY_BAD : NOTIFY_OK;
> +}
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
> index 09469c750a96..7c6594bba796 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/swsmu/inc/amdgpu_smu.h
> @@ -1354,6 +1354,11 @@ struct pptable_funcs {
> * @init_pptable_microcode: Prepare the pptable microcode to upload via PSP
> */
> int (*init_pptable_microcode)(struct smu_context *smu);
> +
> + /**
> + * @set_cpu_smt_enable: Set the CPU SMT status
> + */
> + int (*set_cpu_smt_enable)(struct smu_context *smu, bool enable);
> };
>
> typedef enum {
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list