[PATCH 02/12] drm/amdkfd: EOP Removal - Handle size 0 correctly

[Alex Deucher]

From: David Belanger <david.belanger at amd.com>

On GC 9.4.3, we are removing the EOP buffer.
If we specify 0 for the size, CP_HQD_EOP_CONTROL ends up with
incorrect value as order_size_2 calculations does not handle 0.

Fix it by using zero for the MQD entry for EOP size 0.

v2: Reworked code with a conditional assignment and fixed style issues.

Signed-off-by: David Belanger <david.belanger at amd.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v9.c | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v9.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v9.c
index 09083e905fee..2085054be3be 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v9.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_mqd_manager_v9.c
@@ -256,9 +256,14 @@ static void update_mqd(struct mqd_manager *mm, void *mqd,
 	 * Limit is 0xFF EOP entries (= 0x7F8 dwords). CP will not submit
 	 * more than (EOP entry count - 1) so a queue size of 0x800 dwords
 	 * is safe, giving a maximum field value of 0xA.
+	 *
+	 * Also, do calculation only if EOP is used (size > 0), otherwise
+	 * the order_base_2 calculation provides incorrect result.
+	 *
 	 */
-	m->cp_hqd_eop_control = min(0xA,
-		order_base_2(q->eop_ring_buffer_size / 4) - 1);
+	m->cp_hqd_eop_control = q->eop_ring_buffer_size ?
+		min(0xA, order_base_2(q->eop_ring_buffer_size / 4) - 1) : 0;
+
 	m->cp_hqd_eop_base_addr_lo =
 			lower_32_bits(q->eop_ring_buffer_address >> 8);
 	m->cp_hqd_eop_base_addr_hi =
-- 
2.39.2