[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: remove unnecessary (void*) conversions

[Dan Carpenter]

On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 10:11:39AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 3:17 AM Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter at linaro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:34:28AM +0800, Su Hui wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
> > > index f60753f97ac5..c837e0bf2cfc 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_debugfs.c
> > > @@ -1470,7 +1470,7 @@ int amdgpu_debugfs_regs_init(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> > >
> > >  static int amdgpu_debugfs_test_ib_show(struct seq_file *m, void *unused)
> > >  {
> > > -     struct amdgpu_device *adev = (struct amdgpu_device *)m->private;
> > > +     struct amdgpu_device *adev = m->private;
> > >       struct drm_device *dev = adev_to_drm(adev);
> > >       int r = 0, i;
> > >
> >
> > This declaration block was originally written in reverse Christmas tree
> > order:
> >
> >         long long long variable name;
> >         medium length name;
> >         short name;
> >
> > So you probably want to change the order now that the lengths have
> > changed.  Same in the other places as well.
> 
> I don't think it's possible due to the variable dependencies unless
> you separate the declarations and assignments which doesn't seem like
> a net win to me.

Gar.  I'm dumb.  Sorry for the noise.

regards,
dan carpenter