[PATCH] drm/amdgpu: Fix the vram base start address
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Thu Nov 2 15:39:03 UTC 2023
Am 01.11.23 um 20:13 schrieb Arunpravin Paneer Selvam:
> Hi Christian,
>
> On 10/30/2023 9:34 PM, Christian König wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 30.10.23 um 13:22 schrieb Arunpravin Paneer Selvam:
>>> If the size returned by drm buddy allocator is higher than
>>> the required size, we take the higher size to calculate
>>> the buffer start address. This is required if we couldn't
>>> trim the buffer to the requested size. This will fix the
>>> display corruption issue on APU's which has limited VRAM
>>> size.
>>>
>>> gitlab issue link: https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/drm/amd/-/issues/2859
>>> JIRA ticket link: https://ontrack-internal.amd.com/browse/SWDEV-425461
>>>
>>> Fixes: 0a1844bf0b53 ("drm/buddy: Improve contiguous memory allocation")
>>> Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
>>> <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam at amd.com>
>>
>> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
>>
>> IIRC that hack with the start address is actually not needed any
>> more, but we need to double check this.
> okay, can we just remove this hack and keep the vres->base.start value
> as the start address of the first block from the
> allocated list.
Please double check if we don't have any more cases where we compare the
start address against the visible VRAM limit.
I think we now fixed all those cases and replaced them with calls to
check if all segments are visible, but I'm not 100% sure.
Regards,
Christian.
>
> Thanks,
> Arun
>>
>> Christian.
>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
>>> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
>>> index 18f58efc9dc7..08916538a615 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_vram_mgr.c
>>> @@ -77,7 +77,16 @@ static inline bool
>>> amdgpu_is_vram_mgr_blocks_contiguous(struct list_head *head)
>>> return true;
>>> }
>>> +static inline u64 amdgpu_vram_mgr_blocks_size(struct list_head
>>> *head)
>>> +{
>>> + struct drm_buddy_block *block;
>>> + u64 size = 0;
>>> + list_for_each_entry(block, head, link)
>>> + size += amdgpu_vram_mgr_block_size(block);
>>> +
>>> + return size;
>>> +}
>>> /**
>>> * DOC: mem_info_vram_total
>>> @@ -516,6 +525,8 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct
>>> ttm_resource_manager *man,
>>> mutex_unlock(&mgr->lock);
>>> vres->base.start = 0;
>>> + size = max_t(u64, amdgpu_vram_mgr_blocks_size(&vres->blocks),
>>> + vres->base.size);
>>> list_for_each_entry(block, &vres->blocks, link) {
>>> unsigned long start;
>>> @@ -523,8 +534,8 @@ static int amdgpu_vram_mgr_new(struct
>>> ttm_resource_manager *man,
>>> amdgpu_vram_mgr_block_size(block);
>>> start >>= PAGE_SHIFT;
>>> - if (start > PFN_UP(vres->base.size))
>>> - start -= PFN_UP(vres->base.size);
>>> + if (start > PFN_UP(size))
>>> + start -= PFN_UP(size);
>>> else
>>> start = 0;
>>> vres->base.start = max(vres->base.start, start);
>>
>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list