[PATCH] drm/amd/display: Fix mst hub unplug warning
Wayne Lin
Wayne.Lin at amd.com
Thu Oct 5 08:04:05 UTC 2023
[Why]
Unplug mst hub will cause warning. That's because
dm_helpers_construct_old_payload() is changed to be called after
payload removement from dc link.
In dm_helpers_construct_old_payload(), We refer to the vcpi in
payload allocation table of dc link to construct the old payload
and payload is no longer in the table when we call the function
now.
[How]
Refer to the mst_state to construct the number of time slot for old
payload now. Note that dm_helpers_construct_old_payload() is just
a quick workaround before and we are going to abandon it soon.
Fixes: 5aa1dfcdf0a4 ("drm/mst: Refactor the flow for payload allocation/removement")
Reviewed-by: Jerry Zuo <jerry.zuo at amd.com>
Signed-off-by: Wayne Lin <Wayne.Lin at amd.com>
---
.../amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c | 38 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
index baf7e5254fb3..2f94bcf128c0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm_helpers.c
@@ -204,15 +204,16 @@ void dm_helpers_dp_update_branch_info(
{}
static void dm_helpers_construct_old_payload(
- struct dc_link *link,
- int pbn_per_slot,
+ struct drm_dp_mst_topology_mgr *mgr,
+ struct drm_dp_mst_topology_state *mst_state,
struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *new_payload,
struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *old_payload)
{
- struct link_mst_stream_allocation_table current_link_table =
- link->mst_stream_alloc_table;
- struct link_mst_stream_allocation *dc_alloc;
- int i;
+ struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload *pos;
+ int pbn_per_slot = mst_state->pbn_div;
+ u8 next_payload_vc_start = mgr->next_start_slot;
+ u8 payload_vc_start = new_payload->vc_start_slot;
+ u8 allocated_time_slots;
*old_payload = *new_payload;
@@ -221,20 +222,17 @@ static void dm_helpers_construct_old_payload(
* struct drm_dp_mst_atomic_payload are don't care fields
* while calling drm_dp_remove_payload_part2()
*/
- for (i = 0; i < current_link_table.stream_count; i++) {
- dc_alloc =
- ¤t_link_table.stream_allocations[i];
-
- if (dc_alloc->vcp_id == new_payload->vcpi) {
- old_payload->time_slots = dc_alloc->slot_count;
- old_payload->pbn = dc_alloc->slot_count * pbn_per_slot;
- break;
- }
+ list_for_each_entry(pos, &mst_state->payloads, next) {
+ if (pos != new_payload &&
+ pos->vc_start_slot > payload_vc_start &&
+ pos->vc_start_slot < next_payload_vc_start)
+ next_payload_vc_start = pos->vc_start_slot;
}
- /* make sure there is an old payload*/
- ASSERT(i != current_link_table.stream_count);
+ allocated_time_slots = next_payload_vc_start - payload_vc_start;
+ old_payload->time_slots = allocated_time_slots;
+ old_payload->pbn = allocated_time_slots * pbn_per_slot;
}
/*
@@ -272,8 +270,8 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_write_payload_allocation_table(
drm_dp_add_payload_part1(mst_mgr, mst_state, new_payload);
} else {
/* construct old payload by VCPI*/
- dm_helpers_construct_old_payload(stream->link, mst_state->pbn_div,
- new_payload, &old_payload);
+ dm_helpers_construct_old_payload(mst_mgr, mst_state,
+ new_payload, &old_payload);
target_payload = &old_payload;
drm_dp_remove_payload_part1(mst_mgr, mst_state, new_payload);
@@ -366,7 +364,7 @@ bool dm_helpers_dp_mst_send_payload_allocation(
if (enable) {
ret = drm_dp_add_payload_part2(mst_mgr, mst_state->base.state, new_payload);
} else {
- dm_helpers_construct_old_payload(stream->link, mst_state->pbn_div,
+ dm_helpers_construct_old_payload(mst_mgr, mst_state,
new_payload, &old_payload);
drm_dp_remove_payload_part2(mst_mgr, mst_state, &old_payload, new_payload);
}
--
2.37.3
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list