[PATCH] Find bo_va before create it when map bo into compute VM
Felix Kuehling
felix.kuehling at amd.com
Thu Oct 12 15:20:48 UTC 2023
On 2023-10-11 19:36, Xiaogang.Chen wrote:
> From: Xiaogang Chen <xiaogang.chen at amd.com>
Since you are the author of this updated patch, you should also add your
Signed-off-by below.
>
> This is needed to correctly handle BOs imported into compute VM from gfx.
> Both kfd and gfx should use same bo_va when map the Bos into same VM, otherwise
> we may trigger kernel general protection when iterate mappings from bo_va.
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Kuehling <Felix.Kuehling at amd.com>
> Acked-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ramesh Errabolu <Ramesh.Errabolu at amd.com>
> Reviewed-By: Xiaogang Chen <Xiaogang.Chen at amd.com>
> Tested-By: Xiaogang Chen <Xiaogang.Chen at amd.com>
You lost any mention of reference counting from the commit headline and
description. I think that's still an important concept that should be
mentioned. I'd change the headline to something like this:
drm/amdgpu: Correctly use bo_va->ref_count in compute VMs
Regards,
Felix
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 12 ++++++++++--
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> index a15e59abe70a..c1ec93cc50ae 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
> @@ -832,6 +832,7 @@ static int kfd_mem_attach(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem,
> uint64_t va = mem->va;
> struct kfd_mem_attachment *attachment[2] = {NULL, NULL};
> struct amdgpu_bo *bo[2] = {NULL, NULL};
> + struct amdgpu_bo_va *bo_va;
> bool same_hive = false;
> int i, ret;
>
> @@ -919,7 +920,13 @@ static int kfd_mem_attach(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem,
> pr_debug("Unable to reserve BO during memory attach");
> goto unwind;
> }
> - attachment[i]->bo_va = amdgpu_vm_bo_add(adev, vm, bo[i]);
> + bo_va = amdgpu_vm_bo_find(vm, bo[i]);
> + if (!bo_va)
> + bo_va = amdgpu_vm_bo_add(adev, vm, bo[i]);
> + else
> + ++bo_va->ref_count;
> + attachment[i]->bo_va = bo_va;
> +
> amdgpu_bo_unreserve(bo[i]);
> if (unlikely(!attachment[i]->bo_va)) {
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> @@ -943,7 +950,8 @@ static int kfd_mem_attach(struct amdgpu_device *adev, struct kgd_mem *mem,
> continue;
> if (attachment[i]->bo_va) {
> amdgpu_bo_reserve(bo[i], true);
> - amdgpu_vm_bo_del(adev, attachment[i]->bo_va);
> + if (--attachment[i]->bo_va->ref_count == 0)
> + amdgpu_vm_bo_del(adev, attachment[i]->bo_va);
> amdgpu_bo_unreserve(bo[i]);
> list_del(&attachment[i]->list);
> }
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list