[PATCH] drm/amdkfd: remap unaligned svm ranges that have split
Felix Kuehling
felix.kuehling at amd.com
Thu Oct 19 20:05:50 UTC 2023
On 2023-10-18 18:26, Alex Sierra wrote:
> Split SVM ranges that have been mapped into 2MB page table entries,
> require to be remap in case the split has happened in a non-aligned
> VA.
> [WHY]:
> This condition causes the 2MB page table entries be split into 4KB
> PTEs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Sierra <alex.sierra at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
> index 7b81233bc9ae..1dd9a1cf2358 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_svm.c
> @@ -1104,26 +1104,34 @@ svm_range_split(struct svm_range *prange, uint64_t start, uint64_t last,
> }
>
> static int
> -svm_range_split_tail(struct svm_range *prange,
> - uint64_t new_last, struct list_head *insert_list)
> +svm_range_split_tail(struct svm_range *prange, uint64_t new_last,
> + struct list_head *insert_list, struct list_head *remap_list)
> {
> struct svm_range *tail;
> int r = svm_range_split(prange, prange->start, new_last, &tail);
>
> - if (!r)
> + if (!r) {
> list_add(&tail->list, insert_list);
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(tail->last + 1 - tail->start,
> + 1UL << tail->granularity))
I'm not sure about this condition. I thought this condition should be
about the point where the range is split, not the size of it. So my
understanding is that this should be
if (!IS_ALIGNED(new_last+1, 1UL << prange->granularity))
> + list_add(&tail->update_list, remap_list);
> + }
> return r;
> }
>
> static int
> -svm_range_split_head(struct svm_range *prange,
> - uint64_t new_start, struct list_head *insert_list)
> +svm_range_split_head(struct svm_range *prange, uint64_t new_start,
> + struct list_head *insert_list, struct list_head *remap_list)
> {
> struct svm_range *head;
> int r = svm_range_split(prange, new_start, prange->last, &head);
>
> - if (!r)
> + if (!r) {
> list_add(&head->list, insert_list);
> + if (!IS_ALIGNED(head->last + 1 - head->start,
> + 1UL << head->granularity))
Similar as above.
if (!IS_ALIGNED(new_start, 1UL << prange->granularity))
Regards,
Felix
> + list_add(&head->update_list, remap_list);
> + }
> return r;
> }
>
> @@ -2113,7 +2121,7 @@ static int
> svm_range_add(struct kfd_process *p, uint64_t start, uint64_t size,
> uint32_t nattr, struct kfd_ioctl_svm_attribute *attrs,
> struct list_head *update_list, struct list_head *insert_list,
> - struct list_head *remove_list)
> + struct list_head *remove_list, struct list_head *remap_list)
> {
> unsigned long last = start + size - 1UL;
> struct svm_range_list *svms = &p->svms;
> @@ -2129,6 +2137,7 @@ svm_range_add(struct kfd_process *p, uint64_t start, uint64_t size,
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(insert_list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(remove_list);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&new_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(remap_list);
>
> node = interval_tree_iter_first(&svms->objects, start, last);
> while (node) {
> @@ -2153,6 +2162,7 @@ svm_range_add(struct kfd_process *p, uint64_t start, uint64_t size,
> struct svm_range *old = prange;
>
> prange = svm_range_clone(old);
> +
> if (!prange) {
> r = -ENOMEM;
> goto out;
> @@ -2161,18 +2171,17 @@ svm_range_add(struct kfd_process *p, uint64_t start, uint64_t size,
> list_add(&old->update_list, remove_list);
> list_add(&prange->list, insert_list);
> list_add(&prange->update_list, update_list);
> -
> if (node->start < start) {
> pr_debug("change old range start\n");
> r = svm_range_split_head(prange, start,
> - insert_list);
> + insert_list, remap_list);
> if (r)
> goto out;
> }
> if (node->last > last) {
> pr_debug("change old range last\n");
> r = svm_range_split_tail(prange, last,
> - insert_list);
> + insert_list, remap_list);
> if (r)
> goto out;
> }
> @@ -3565,6 +3574,7 @@ svm_range_set_attr(struct kfd_process *p, struct mm_struct *mm,
> struct list_head update_list;
> struct list_head insert_list;
> struct list_head remove_list;
> + struct list_head remap_list;
> struct svm_range_list *svms;
> struct svm_range *prange;
> struct svm_range *next;
> @@ -3596,7 +3606,7 @@ svm_range_set_attr(struct kfd_process *p, struct mm_struct *mm,
>
> /* Add new range and split existing ranges as needed */
> r = svm_range_add(p, start, size, nattr, attrs, &update_list,
> - &insert_list, &remove_list);
> + &insert_list, &remove_list, &remap_list);
> if (r) {
> mutex_unlock(&svms->lock);
> mmap_write_unlock(mm);
> @@ -3661,6 +3671,19 @@ svm_range_set_attr(struct kfd_process *p, struct mm_struct *mm,
> ret = r;
> }
>
> + list_for_each_entry(prange, &remap_list, update_list) {
> + pr_debug("Remapping prange 0x%p [0x%lx 0x%lx]\n",
> + prange, prange->start, prange->last);
> + mutex_lock(&prange->migrate_mutex);
> + r = svm_range_validate_and_map(mm, prange, MAX_GPU_INSTANCE,
> + true, true, prange->mapped_to_gpu);
> + if (r)
> + pr_debug("failed %d on remap svm range\n", r);
> + mutex_unlock(&prange->migrate_mutex);
> + if (r)
> + ret = r;
> + }
> +
> dynamic_svm_range_dump(svms);
>
> mutex_unlock(&svms->lock);
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list