[PATCH 06/15] platform/x86/amd/pmf: Add support to get inputs from other subsystems
Shyam Sundar S K
Shyam-sundar.S-k at amd.com
Sat Sep 30 08:40:15 UTC 2023
On 9/26/2023 10:38 PM, Ilpo Järvinen wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Sep 2023, Shyam Sundar S K wrote:
>
>> PMF driver sends changing inputs from each subystem to TA for evaluating
>> the conditions in the policy binary.
>>
>> Add initial support of plumbing in the PMF driver for Smart PC to get
>> information from other subsystems in the kernel.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k at amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile | 2 +-
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h | 18 ++++
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c | 118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c | 3 +
>> 4 files changed, 140 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> create mode 100644 drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> index d2746ee7369f..6b26e48ce8ad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/Makefile
>> @@ -7,4 +7,4 @@
>> obj-$(CONFIG_AMD_PMF) += amd-pmf.o
>> amd-pmf-objs := core.o acpi.o sps.o \
>> auto-mode.o cnqf.o \
>> - tee-if.o
>> + tee-if.o spc.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> index 81acf2a37366..e64b4d285624 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/pmf.h
>> @@ -146,6 +146,21 @@ struct smu_pmf_metrics {
>> u16 infra_gfx_maxfreq; /* in MHz */
>> u16 skin_temp; /* in centi-Celsius */
>> u16 device_state;
>> + u16 curtemp; /* in centi-Celsius */
>> + u16 filter_alpha_value;
>> + u16 avg_gfx_clkfrequency;
>> + u16 avg_fclk_frequency;
>> + u16 avg_gfx_activity;
>> + u16 avg_socclk_frequency;
>> + u16 avg_vclk_frequency;
>> + u16 avg_vcn_activity;
>> + u16 avg_dram_reads;
>> + u16 avg_dram_writes;
>> + u16 avg_socket_power;
>> + u16 avg_core_power[2];
>> + u16 avg_core_c0residency[16];
>> + u16 spare1;
>> + u32 metrics_counter;
>> } __packed;
>>
>> enum amd_stt_skin_temp {
>> @@ -592,4 +607,7 @@ extern const struct attribute_group cnqf_feature_attribute_group;
>> int amd_pmf_init_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>> void amd_pmf_deinit_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev);
>> int apmf_check_smart_pc(struct amd_pmf_dev *pmf_dev);
>> +
>> +/* Smart PC - TA interfaces */
>> +void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in);
>> #endif /* PMF_H */
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..08159cd5f853
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/spc.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * AMD Platform Management Framework Driver - Smart PC Capabilities
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2023, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
>> + * All Rights Reserved.
>> + *
>> + * Authors: Shyam Sundar S K <Shyam-sundar.S-k at amd.com>
>> + * Patil Rajesh Reddy <Patil.Reddy at amd.com>
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <acpi/button.h>
>> +#include <linux/power_supply.h>
>> +#include "pmf.h"
>> +
>> +static void amd_pmf_get_smu_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
>> +{
>> + u16 max, avg = 0;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + memset(dev->buf, 0, sizeof(dev->m_table));
>> + amd_pmf_send_cmd(dev, SET_TRANSFER_TABLE, 0, 7, NULL);
>> + memcpy(&dev->m_table, dev->buf, sizeof(dev->m_table));
>> +
>> + in->ev_info.socket_power = dev->m_table.apu_power + dev->m_table.dgpu_power;
>> + in->ev_info.skin_temperature = dev->m_table.skin_temp;
>> +
>> + /* get the avg C0 residency of all the cores */
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++)
>> + avg += dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
>
> Is this safe from overflow?
Yes I think. Can you elaborate a bit more please if there a overflow
and I am missing it?
Thanks,
Shyam
>
>> +
>> + /* get the max C0 residency of all the cores */
>> + max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[0];
>> + for (i = 1; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency); i++) {
>> + if (dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i] > max)
>> + max = dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency[i];
>> + }
>> +
>> + in->ev_info.avg_c0residency = avg / ARRAY_SIZE(dev->m_table.avg_core_c0residency);
>> + in->ev_info.max_c0residency = max;
>> + in->ev_info.gfx_busy = dev->m_table.avg_gfx_activity;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const char * const pmf_battery_supply_name[] = {
>> + "BATT",
>> + "BAT0",
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int get_battery_prop(enum power_supply_property prop)
>> +{
>> + union power_supply_propval value;
>> + struct power_supply *psy;
>> + int i, ret = -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(pmf_battery_supply_name); i++) {
>> + psy = power_supply_get_by_name(pmf_battery_supply_name[i]);
>> + if (!psy)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + ret = power_supply_get_property(psy, prop, &value);
>> + if (ret) {
>> + power_supply_put(psy);
>> + return ret;
>> + }
>> + }
>> +
>> + return value.intval;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_pmf_get_battery_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
>> +{
>> + int val;
>> +
>> + val = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_PRESENT);
>> + if (val != 1)
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> + in->ev_info.bat_percentage = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_CAPACITY);
>> + /* all values in mWh metrics */
>> + in->ev_info.bat_design = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL_DESIGN) / 1000;
>> + in->ev_info.full_charge_capacity = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_ENERGY_FULL) / 1000;
>> + in->ev_info.drain_rate = get_battery_prop(POWER_SUPPLY_PROP_POWER_NOW) / 1000;
>
> You don't need literal, use the defines provided in linux/units.h.
>
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int amd_pmf_get_slider_info(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
>> +{
>> + int val;
>> +
>> + switch (dev->current_profile) {
>> + case PLATFORM_PROFILE_PERFORMANCE:
>> + val = TA_BEST_PERFORMANCE;
>> + break;
>> + case PLATFORM_PROFILE_BALANCED:
>> + val = TA_BETTER_PERFORMANCE;
>> + break;
>> + case PLATFORM_PROFILE_LOW_POWER:
>> + val = TA_BEST_BATTERY;
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + dev_err(dev->dev, "Unknown Platform Profile.\n");
>> + return -EOPNOTSUPP;
>> + }
>> + in->ev_info.power_slider = val;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +void amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev, struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in)
>> +{
>> + /* TA side lid open is 1 and close is 0, hence the ! here */
>> + in->ev_info.lid_state = !acpi_lid_open();
>> + in->ev_info.power_source = amd_pmf_get_power_source();
>> + amd_pmf_get_smu_info(dev, in);
>> + amd_pmf_get_battery_info(dev, in);
>> + amd_pmf_get_slider_info(dev, in);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> index a8b05e746efd..eb25d5ce3a9a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/amd/pmf/tee-if.c
>> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>> {
>> struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *ta_sm = NULL;
>> struct ta_pmf_enact_result *out = NULL;
>> + struct ta_pmf_enact_table *in = NULL;
>> struct tee_param param[MAX_TEE_PARAM];
>> struct tee_ioctl_invoke_arg arg;
>> int ret = 0;
>> @@ -123,11 +124,13 @@ static int amd_pmf_invoke_cmd_enact(struct amd_pmf_dev *dev)
>> memset(dev->shbuf, 0, dev->policy_sz);
>> ta_sm = (struct ta_pmf_shared_memory *)dev->shbuf;
>> out = &ta_sm->pmf_output.policy_apply_table;
>> + in = &ta_sm->pmf_input.enact_table;
>>
>> memset(ta_sm, 0, sizeof(struct ta_pmf_shared_memory));
>> ta_sm->command_id = TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER__ENACT_POLICIES;
>> ta_sm->if_version = PMF_TA_IF_VERSION__MAJOR;
>>
>> + amd_pmf_populate_ta_inputs(dev, in);
>> amd_pmf_prepare_args(dev, TA_PMF_COMMAND_POLICY_BUILDER__ENACT_POLICIES, &arg, param);
>>
>> ret = tee_client_invoke_func(dev->tee_ctx, &arg, param);
>>
>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list