[PATCH 2/2] drm/amdgpu/mes11: Use a separate fence per transaction
Alex Deucher
alexander.deucher at amd.com
Mon Apr 22 14:37:38 UTC 2024
We can't use a shared fence location because each transaction
should be considered independently.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c | 12 ++++++++++++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.h | 4 ++++
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c
index 78e4f88f5134..92c6fae780f1 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.c
@@ -32,6 +32,18 @@
#define AMDGPU_MES_MAX_NUM_OF_QUEUES_PER_PROCESS 1024
#define AMDGPU_ONE_DOORBELL_SIZE 8
+signed long amdgpu_mes_fence_wait_polling(u64 *fence,
+ u64 wait_seq,
+ signed long timeout)
+{
+
+ while ((s64)(wait_seq - *fence) > 0 && timeout > 0) {
+ udelay(2);
+ timeout -= 2;
+ }
+ return timeout > 0 ? timeout : 0;
+}
+
int amdgpu_mes_doorbell_process_slice(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
{
return roundup(AMDGPU_ONE_DOORBELL_SIZE *
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.h
index 6b3e1844eac5..b99a2b3cffe3 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_mes.h
@@ -340,6 +340,10 @@ struct amdgpu_mes_funcs {
#define amdgpu_mes_kiq_hw_init(adev) (adev)->mes.kiq_hw_init((adev))
#define amdgpu_mes_kiq_hw_fini(adev) (adev)->mes.kiq_hw_fini((adev))
+signed long amdgpu_mes_fence_wait_polling(u64 *fence,
+ u64 wait_seq,
+ signed long timeout);
+
int amdgpu_mes_ctx_get_offs(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned int id_offs);
int amdgpu_mes_init_microcode(struct amdgpu_device *adev, int pipe);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c
index eb25af46622e..09193aee71c7 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c
@@ -163,6 +163,10 @@ static int mes_v11_0_submit_pkt_and_poll_completion(struct amdgpu_mes *mes,
unsigned long flags;
signed long timeout = 3000000; /* 3000 ms */
const char *op_str, *misc_op_str;
+ u32 fence_offset;
+ u64 fence_gpu_addr;
+ u64 *fence_ptr;
+ int ret;
if (x_pkt->header.opcode >= MES_SCH_API_MAX)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -175,15 +179,24 @@ static int mes_v11_0_submit_pkt_and_poll_completion(struct amdgpu_mes *mes,
}
BUG_ON(size % 4 != 0);
+ ret = amdgpu_device_wb_get(adev, &fence_offset);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+ fence_gpu_addr =
+ adev->wb.gpu_addr + (fence_offset * 4);
+ fence_ptr = (u64 *)&adev->wb.wb[fence_offset];
+ *fence_ptr = 0;
+
spin_lock_irqsave(&mes->ring_lock, flags);
if (amdgpu_ring_alloc(ring, ndw)) {
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mes->ring_lock, flags);
+ amdgpu_device_wb_free(adev, fence_offset);
return -ENOMEM;
}
api_status = (struct MES_API_STATUS *)((char *)pkt + api_status_off);
- api_status->api_completion_fence_addr = mes->ring.fence_drv.gpu_addr;
- api_status->api_completion_fence_value = ++mes->ring.fence_drv.sync_seq;
+ api_status->api_completion_fence_addr = fence_gpu_addr;
+ api_status->api_completion_fence_value = 1;
amdgpu_ring_write_multiple(ring, pkt, ndw);
amdgpu_ring_commit(ring);
@@ -199,8 +212,8 @@ static int mes_v11_0_submit_pkt_and_poll_completion(struct amdgpu_mes *mes,
else
dev_dbg(adev->dev, "MES msg=%d was emitted\n", x_pkt->header.opcode);
- r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, ring->fence_drv.sync_seq,
- timeout);
+ r = amdgpu_mes_fence_wait_polling(fence_ptr, (u64)1, timeout);
+ amdgpu_device_wb_free(adev, fence_offset);
if (r < 1) {
if (misc_op_str)
--
2.44.0
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list