[PATCH v1] drivers:smumgr:Variable names should be consistent
Alex Deucher
alexdeucher at gmail.com
Thu Aug 22 16:35:11 UTC 2024
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024 at 3:49 AM Yang Ruibin <11162571 at vivo.com> wrote:
>
> The variable highest_pcie_level_enabled is named
> hightest_pcie_level_enabled in other modules.
hightest is a typo. It should be highest. Please fix up the
misspellings instead.
Alex
> Please ensure the consistency of variable naming
> and use min macros instead of the triadic operator.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Ruibin <11162571 at vivo.com>
> ---
> .../drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/tonga_smumgr.c | 17 +++++++++--------
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/tonga_smumgr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/tonga_smumgr.c
> index 6fe6e6abb..60b1387f6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/tonga_smumgr.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/pm/powerplay/smumgr/tonga_smumgr.c
> @@ -700,7 +700,7 @@ static int tonga_populate_all_graphic_levels(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
> SMU72_Discrete_GraphicsLevel *levels = smu_data->smc_state_table.GraphicsLevel;
>
> uint32_t i, max_entry;
> - uint8_t highest_pcie_level_enabled = 0;
> + uint8_t hightest_pcie_level_enabled = 0;
> uint8_t lowest_pcie_level_enabled = 0, mid_pcie_level_enabled = 0;
> uint8_t count = 0;
> int result = 0;
> @@ -747,8 +747,8 @@ static int tonga_populate_all_graphic_levels(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
>
> while (data->dpm_level_enable_mask.pcie_dpm_enable_mask &&
> ((data->dpm_level_enable_mask.pcie_dpm_enable_mask &
> - (1<<(highest_pcie_level_enabled+1))) != 0)) {
> - highest_pcie_level_enabled++;
> + (1<<(hightest_pcie_level_enabled+1))) != 0)) {
> + hightest_pcie_level_enabled++;
> }
>
> while (data->dpm_level_enable_mask.pcie_dpm_enable_mask &&
> @@ -757,18 +757,19 @@ static int tonga_populate_all_graphic_levels(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
> lowest_pcie_level_enabled++;
> }
>
> - while ((count < highest_pcie_level_enabled) &&
> + while ((count < hightest_pcie_level_enabled) &&
> ((data->dpm_level_enable_mask.pcie_dpm_enable_mask &
> (1<<(lowest_pcie_level_enabled+1+count))) == 0)) {
> count++;
> }
> - mid_pcie_level_enabled = (lowest_pcie_level_enabled+1+count) < highest_pcie_level_enabled ?
> - (lowest_pcie_level_enabled+1+count) : highest_pcie_level_enabled;
>
> + mid_pcie_level_enabled = min(lowest_pcie_level_enabled+1+count,
> + hightest_pcie_level_enabled);
>
> - /* set pcieDpmLevel to highest_pcie_level_enabled*/
> + /* set pcieDpmLevel to hightest_pcie_level_enabled*/
> for (i = 2; i < dpm_table->sclk_table.count; i++)
> - smu_data->smc_state_table.GraphicsLevel[i].pcieDpmLevel = highest_pcie_level_enabled;
> + smu_data->smc_state_table.GraphicsLevel[i].pcieDpmLevel =
> + hightest_pcie_level_enabled;
>
> /* set pcieDpmLevel to lowest_pcie_level_enabled*/
> smu_data->smc_state_table.GraphicsLevel[0].pcieDpmLevel = lowest_pcie_level_enabled;
> --
> 2.34.1
>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list