[PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu: Use device wedged event

[Christian König]

Am 13.12.24 um 16:56 schrieb André Almeida:
> Em 13/12/2024 11:36, Raag Jadav escreveu:
>> On Fri, Dec 13, 2024 at 11:15:31AM -0300, André Almeida wrote:
>>> Hi Christian,
>>>
>>> Em 13/12/2024 04:34, Christian König escreveu:
>>>> Am 12.12.24 um 20:09 schrieb André Almeida:
>>>>> Use DRM's device wedged event to notify userspace that a reset had
>>>>> happened. For now, only use `none` method meant for telemetry
>>>>> capture.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: André Almeida <andrealmeid at igalia.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>    drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 3 +++
>>>>>    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/ drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>> index 96316111300a..19e1a5493778 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
>>>>> @@ -6057,6 +6057,9 @@ int amdgpu_device_gpu_recover(struct
>>>>> amdgpu_device *adev,
>>>>>            dev_info(adev->dev, "GPU reset end with ret = %d\n", r);
>>>>> atomic_set(&adev->reset_domain->reset_res, r);
>>>>> +
>>>>> +    drm_dev_wedged_event(adev_to_drm(adev), 
>>>>> DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_NONE);
>>>>
>>>> That looks really good in general. I would just make the
>>>> DRM_WEDGE_RECOVERY_NONE depend on the value of "r".
>>>>
>>>
>>> Why depend or `r`? A reset was triggered anyway, regardless of the 
>>> success
>>> of it, shouldn't we tell userspace?
>>
>> A failed reset would perhaps result in wedging, atleast that's how i915
>> is handling it.
>>
>
> Right, and I think this raises the question of what wedge recovery 
> method should I add for amdgpu... Christian?
>

In theory a rebind should be enough to get the device going again, our 
BOCO does a bus reset on driver load anyway.

Regards,
Christian.