[PATCH v6 3/3] drm/buddy: Add defragmentation support
Christian König
christian.koenig at amd.com
Fri Feb 16 12:33:37 UTC 2024
Am 16.02.24 um 13:23 schrieb Matthew Auld:
> On 08/02/2024 15:50, Arunpravin Paneer Selvam wrote:
>> Add a function to support defragmentation.
>>
>> v1: Defragment the memory beginning from min_order
>> till the required memory space is available.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Paneer Selvam
>> <Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam at amd.com>
>> Suggested-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld at intel.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 67 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
>> include/drm/drm_buddy.h | 3 ++
>
> No users?
Other question is how can a buddy allocator fragment in the first place?
Christian.
>
>> 2 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
>> index 33ad0cfbd54c..fac423d2cb73 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c
>> @@ -276,10 +276,12 @@ drm_get_buddy(struct drm_buddy_block *block)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_get_buddy);
>> -static void __drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>> - struct drm_buddy_block *block)
>> +static unsigned int __drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>> + struct drm_buddy_block *block,
>> + bool defrag)
>> {
>> struct drm_buddy_block *parent;
>> + unsigned int order;
>> while ((parent = block->parent)) {
>> struct drm_buddy_block *buddy;
>> @@ -289,12 +291,14 @@ static void __drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>> if (!drm_buddy_block_is_free(buddy))
>> break;
>> - if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block) !=
>> - drm_buddy_block_is_clear(buddy))
>> - break;
>> + if (!defrag) {
>> + if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block) !=
>> + drm_buddy_block_is_clear(buddy))
>> + break;
>> - if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block))
>> - mark_cleared(parent);
>> + if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block))
>> + mark_cleared(parent);
>> + }
>
> Maybe check if the two blocks are incompatible and chuck a warn if
> they are not? Main thing is not to hide issues with split blocks that
> should have been merged before.
>
>> list_del(&buddy->link);
>> @@ -304,8 +308,49 @@ static void __drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy
>> *mm,
>> block = parent;
>> }
>> + order = drm_buddy_block_order(block);
>> mark_free(mm, block);
>> +
>> + return order;
>> +}
>> +
>> +/**
>> + * drm_buddy_defrag - Defragmentation routine
>> + *
>> + * @mm: DRM buddy manager
>> + * @min_order: minimum order in the freelist to begin
>> + * the defragmentation process
>> + *
>> + * Driver calls the defragmentation function when the
>> + * requested memory allocation returns -ENOSPC.
>> + */
>> +void drm_buddy_defrag(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>> + unsigned int min_order)
>
> Just wondering if we need "full defag" also? We would probably need to
> call this at fini() anyway.
>
>> +{
>> + struct drm_buddy_block *block;
>> + struct list_head *list;
>> + unsigned int order;
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + if (min_order > mm->max_order)
>> + return;
>> +
>> + for (i = min_order - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
>
> Need to be careful with min_order = 0 ?
>
>> + list = &mm->free_list[i];
>> + if (list_empty(list))
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + list_for_each_entry_reverse(block, list, link) {
>
> Don't we need the safe_reverse() variant here, since this is removing
> from the list?
>
>> + if (!block->parent)
>> + continue;
>> +
>> + order = __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 1);
>> + if (order >= min_order)
>> + return;
>> + }
>> + }
>> }
>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_buddy_defrag);
>> /**
>> * drm_buddy_free_block - free a block
>> @@ -321,7 +366,7 @@ void drm_buddy_free_block(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>> if (drm_buddy_block_is_clear(block))
>> mm->clear_avail += drm_buddy_block_size(mm, block);
>> - __drm_buddy_free(mm, block);
>> + __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 0);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_buddy_free_block);
>> @@ -470,7 +515,7 @@ __alloc_range_bias(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>> if (buddy &&
>> (drm_buddy_block_is_free(block) &&
>> drm_buddy_block_is_free(buddy)))
>> - __drm_buddy_free(mm, block);
>> + __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 0);
>> return ERR_PTR(err);
>> }
>> @@ -588,7 +633,7 @@ alloc_from_freelist(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>> err_undo:
>> if (tmp != order)
>> - __drm_buddy_free(mm, block);
>> + __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 0);
>> return ERR_PTR(err);
>> }
>> @@ -668,7 +713,7 @@ static int __alloc_range(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>> if (buddy &&
>> (drm_buddy_block_is_free(block) &&
>> drm_buddy_block_is_free(buddy)))
>> - __drm_buddy_free(mm, block);
>> + __drm_buddy_free(mm, block, 0);
>> err_free:
>> if (err == -ENOSPC && total_allocated_on_err) {
>> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
>> index d81c596dfa38..d0f63e7b5915 100644
>> --- a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
>> +++ b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h
>> @@ -166,6 +166,9 @@ void drm_buddy_free_list(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>> struct list_head *objects,
>> unsigned int flags);
>> +void drm_buddy_defrag(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>> + unsigned int min_order);
>> +
>> void drm_buddy_print(struct drm_buddy *mm, struct drm_printer *p);
>> void drm_buddy_block_print(struct drm_buddy *mm,
>> struct drm_buddy_block *block,
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list