[PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu: drop setting buffer funcs in sdma442
Ma, Le
Le.Ma at amd.com
Fri Mar 15 12:15:21 UTC 2024
[AMD Official Use Only - General]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lazar, Lijo <Lijo.Lazar at amd.com<mailto:Lijo.Lazar at amd.com>>
> Sent: Friday, March 15, 2024 6:14 PM
> To: Ma, Le <Le.Ma at amd.com<mailto:Le.Ma at amd.com>>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org<mailto:amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
> Cc: Zhang, Hawking <Hawking.Zhang at amd.com<mailto:Hawking.Zhang at amd.com>>; Song, Asher
> <Asher.Song at amd.com<mailto:Asher.Song at amd.com>>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com<mailto:Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] drm/amdgpu: drop setting buffer funcs in sdma442
>
>
>
> On 3/15/2024 2:46 PM, Le Ma wrote:
> > To fix the entity rq NULL issue. This setting has been moved to upper level.
> >
>
> Need to call amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status(adev, true/false) in
> mode-2 reset handlers as well.
Thanks for pointing out this. I think we can make another separated patch to handle it for mode2 since this patch is for alignment purpose. Actually, the set_buffer_funcs will not be unset/set in reset case as the conditions below:
void amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status(struct amdgpu_device *adev, bool enable)
{
struct ttm_resource_manager *man = ttm_manager_type(&adev->mman.bdev, TTM_PL_VRAM);
uint64_t size;
int r;
if (!adev->mman.initialized || amdgpu_in_reset(adev) ||
adev->mman.buffer_funcs_enabled == enable || adev->gmc.is_app_apu)
return;
>
> Thanks,
> Lijo
>
> > Fixes b70438004a14 ("drm/amdgpu: move buffer funcs setting up a
> > level")
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Le Ma <le.ma at amd.com<mailto:le.ma at amd.com>>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_4_2.c | 20 +-------------------
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_4_2.c
> > b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_4_2.c
> > index eaa4f5f49949..589a734982a7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_4_2.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/sdma_v4_4_2.c
> > @@ -431,16 +431,11 @@ static void sdma_v4_4_2_inst_gfx_stop(struct
> amdgpu_device *adev,
> > struct amdgpu_ring *sdma[AMDGPU_MAX_SDMA_INSTANCES];
> > u32 doorbell_offset, doorbell;
> > u32 rb_cntl, ib_cntl;
> > - int i, unset = 0;
> > + int i;
> >
> > for_each_inst(i, inst_mask) {
> > sdma[i] = &adev->sdma.instance[i].ring;
> >
> > - if ((adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring == sdma[i]) && unset != 1) {
> > - amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status(adev, false);
> > - unset = 1;
> > - }
> > -
> > rb_cntl = RREG32_SDMA(i, regSDMA_GFX_RB_CNTL);
> > rb_cntl = REG_SET_FIELD(rb_cntl, SDMA_GFX_RB_CNTL,
> RB_ENABLE, 0);
> > WREG32_SDMA(i, regSDMA_GFX_RB_CNTL, rb_cntl); @@ -
> 490,17 +485,10 @@
> > static void sdma_v4_4_2_inst_page_stop(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
> > struct amdgpu_ring *sdma[AMDGPU_MAX_SDMA_INSTANCES];
> > u32 rb_cntl, ib_cntl;
> > int i;
> > - bool unset = false;
> >
> > for_each_inst(i, inst_mask) {
> > sdma[i] = &adev->sdma.instance[i].page;
> >
> > - if ((adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring == sdma[i]) &&
> > - (!unset)) {
> > - amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status(adev, false);
> > - unset = true;
> > - }
> > -
> > rb_cntl = RREG32_SDMA(i, regSDMA_PAGE_RB_CNTL);
> > rb_cntl = REG_SET_FIELD(rb_cntl, SDMA_PAGE_RB_CNTL,
> > RB_ENABLE, 0);
> > @@ -950,13 +938,7 @@ static int sdma_v4_4_2_inst_start(struct
> amdgpu_device *adev,
> > r = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(page);
> > if (r)
> > return r;
> > -
> > - if (adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring == page)
> > - amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status(adev,
> true);
> > }
> > -
> > - if (adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring == ring)
> > - amdgpu_ttm_set_buffer_funcs_status(adev, true);
> > }
> >
> > return r;
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20240315/ef8cb211/attachment-0001.htm>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list