[PATCH v1 12/12] fbdev/viafb: Make I2C terminology more inclusive

[Easwar Hariharan]

On 5/3/2024 12:39 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
> 
> Am 03.05.24 um 00:26 schrieb Easwar Hariharan:
>> On 5/2/2024 3:46 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
>>>
>>> Am 30.04.24 um 19:38 schrieb Easwar Hariharan:
>>>> I2C v7, SMBus 3.2, and I3C 1.1.1 specifications have replaced "master/slave"
>>>> with more appropriate terms. Inspired by and following on to Wolfram's
>>>> series to fix drivers/i2c/[1], fix the terminology for users of
>>>> I2C_ALGOBIT bitbanging interface, now that the approved verbiage exists
>>>> in the specification.
>>>>
>>>> Compile tested, no functionality changes intended
>>>>
>>>> [1]: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240322132619.6389-1-wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com/
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Easwar Hariharan <eahariha at linux.microsoft.com>
>>> Acked-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de>
>>>
>> Thanks for the ack! I had been addressing feedback as I got it on the v0 series, and it seems
>> I missed out on updating viafb and smscufx to spec-compliant controller/target terminology like
>> the v0->v1 changelog calls out before posting v1.
>>
>> For smscufx, I feel phrasing the following line (as an example)
>>
>>> -/* sets up I2C Controller for 100 Kbps, std. speed, 7-bit addr, host,
>>> +/* sets up I2C Controller for 100 Kbps, std. speed, 7-bit addr, *controller*,
>> would actually impact readability negatively, so I propose to leave smscufx as is.
> 
> Why? I don't see much of a difference.
> 
>>
>> For viafb, I propose making it compliant with the spec using the controller/target terminology and
>> posting a v2 respin (which I can send out as soon as you say) and ask you to review again.
>>
>> What do you think?
> 
> I think we should adopt the spec's language everywhere. That makes it possible to grep the spec for terms used in the source code. Using 'host' in smscufx appears to introduce yet another term. If you are worried about using 'I2C controller' and 'controller' in the same sentence, you can replace 'I2C controller' with 'DDC channel'. That's even more precise about the purpose of this code.

Great, thanks! That was exactly my concern, I will fix up smscufx and send a v2.

Thanks,
Easwar