[PATCH] drm/amdkfd: Differentiate logging message for driver oversubscription

Chen, Xiaogang xiaogang.chen at amd.com
Wed Nov 6 17:21:44 UTC 2024


On 11/5/2024 6:31 PM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>
> On 2024-10-28 17:40, Xiaogang.Chen wrote:
>> From: Xiaogang Chen <xiaogang.chen at amd.com>
>>
>> To allow user better understand the cause triggering runlist 
>> oversubscription.
>> No function change.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaogang Chen Xiaogang.Chen at amd.com
>> ---
>>   .../gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c   | 55 ++++++++++++++-----
>>   1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c
>> index 37930629edc5..e22be6da23b7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_packet_manager.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,10 @@
>>   #include "kfd_kernel_queue.h"
>>   #include "kfd_priv.h"
>>   +#define OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_PROCESS_COUNT 1 << 0
>> +#define OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_COMPUTE_QUEUE_COUNT 1 << 1
>> +#define OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_GWS_QUEUE_COUNT 1 << 2
>> +
>>   static inline void inc_wptr(unsigned int *wptr, unsigned int 
>> increment_bytes,
>>                   unsigned int buffer_size_bytes)
>>   {
>> @@ -40,7 +44,7 @@ static inline void inc_wptr(unsigned int *wptr, 
>> unsigned int increment_bytes,
>>     static void pm_calc_rlib_size(struct packet_manager *pm,
>>                   unsigned int *rlib_size,
>> -                bool *over_subscription)
>> +                int *over_subscription)
>>   {
>>       unsigned int process_count, queue_count, compute_queue_count, 
>> gws_queue_count;
>>       unsigned int map_queue_size;
>> @@ -58,17 +62,20 @@ static void pm_calc_rlib_size(struct 
>> packet_manager *pm,
>>        * hws_max_conc_proc has been done in
>>        * kgd2kfd_device_init().
>>        */
>> -    *over_subscription = false;
>> +    *over_subscription = 0;
>>         if (node->max_proc_per_quantum > 1)
>>           max_proc_per_quantum = node->max_proc_per_quantum;
>>   -    if ((process_count > max_proc_per_quantum) ||
>> -        compute_queue_count > get_cp_queues_num(pm->dqm) ||
>> -        gws_queue_count > 1) {
>> -        *over_subscription = true;
>> +    if (process_count > max_proc_per_quantum)
>> +        *over_subscription = *over_subscription || 
>> OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_PROCESS_COUNT;
>> +    if (compute_queue_count > get_cp_queues_num(pm->dqm))
>> +        *over_subscription = *over_subscription || 
>> OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_COMPUTE_QUEUE_COUNT;
>> +    if (gws_queue_count > 1)
>> +        *over_subscription = *over_subscription || 
>> OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_GWS_QUEUE_COUNT;
>> +
>> +    if (*over_subscription)
>>           dev_dbg(dev, "Over subscribed runlist\n");
>> -    }
>>         map_queue_size = pm->pmf->map_queues_size;
>>       /* calculate run list ib allocation size */
>> @@ -89,7 +96,7 @@ static int pm_allocate_runlist_ib(struct 
>> packet_manager *pm,
>>                   unsigned int **rl_buffer,
>>                   uint64_t *rl_gpu_buffer,
>>                   unsigned int *rl_buffer_size,
>> -                bool *is_over_subscription)
>> +                int *is_over_subscription)
>>   {
>>       struct kfd_node *node = pm->dqm->dev;
>>       struct device *dev = node->adev->dev;
>> @@ -134,7 +141,7 @@ static int pm_create_runlist_ib(struct 
>> packet_manager *pm,
>>       struct qcm_process_device *qpd;
>>       struct queue *q;
>>       struct kernel_queue *kq;
>> -    bool is_over_subscription;
>> +    int is_over_subscription;
>>         rl_wptr = retval = processes_mapped = 0;
>>   @@ -212,16 +219,38 @@ static int pm_create_runlist_ib(struct 
>> packet_manager *pm,
>>       dev_dbg(dev, "Finished map process and queues to runlist\n");
>>         if (is_over_subscription) {
>> -        if (!pm->is_over_subscription)
>> -            dev_warn(
>> +        if (!pm->is_over_subscription) {
>> +
>> +            if (is_over_subscription & 
>> OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_PROCESS_COUNT) {
>> +                dev_warn(
>>                   dev,
>> -                "Runlist is getting oversubscribed. Expect reduced 
>> ROCm performance.\n");
>> +                "process number is more than maximum number of 
>> processes that"
>> +                " HWS can schedule concurrently. Runlist is getting"
>> +                " oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            if (is_over_subscription & 
>> OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_COMPUTE_QUEUE_COUNT) {
>> +                dev_warn(
>> +                dev,
>> +                "compute queue number is more than assigned compute 
>> queues."
>> +                " Runlist is getting"
>> +                " oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
>> +            }
>> +
>> +            if (is_over_subscription & 
>> OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_GWS_QUEUE_COUNT) {
>> +                dev_warn(
>> +                dev,
>> +                "compute queue for cooperative workgroup is more 
>> than allowed."
>> +                " Runlist is getting"
>> +                " oversubscribed. Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n");
>> +            }
>
> I like the concept of showing the cause of oversubscription. Maybe we 
> should add "process isolation mode" as a special case of "process count".
>
> The messages are overly verbose. There is a common part of the message 
> that could be printed if is_over_subscription is non-zero. Then just 
> print some extra info about the cause, e.g.:
>
>     if (is_over_subscription) {
>         dev_warn("Runlist is getting oversubscribed due to%s%s%s. 
> Expect reduced ROCm performance.\n",
>             is_over_subscription & OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_PROCESS_COUNT ? " 
> number-of-processes" : "",
>             is_over_subscription & 
> OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_COMPUTE_QUEUE_COUNT ? " number-of-queues" : "",
>             is_over_subscription & OVER_SUBSCRIPTION_GWS_QUEUE_COUNT ? 
> " cooperative-launch" : "");
>     }

Yes, that makes code concise.

Regards

Xiaogang

>
> Regards,
>   Felix
>
>
>> +        }
>>           retval = pm->pmf->runlist(pm, &rl_buffer[rl_wptr],
>>                       *rl_gpu_addr,
>>                       alloc_size_bytes / sizeof(uint32_t),
>>                       true);
>>       }
>> -    pm->is_over_subscription = is_over_subscription;
>> +    pm->is_over_subscription = is_over_subscription ? true : false;
>>         for (i = 0; i < alloc_size_bytes / sizeof(uint32_t); i++)
>>           pr_debug("0x%2X ", rl_buffer[i]);


More information about the amd-gfx mailing list