[PATCH 6.6 00/28] fix CVE-2024-46701

Chuck Lever III chuck.lever at oracle.com
Wed Nov 6 15:19:33 UTC 2024



> On Nov 6, 2024, at 1:16 AM, Greg KH <gregkh at linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Oct 24, 2024 at 09:19:41PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote:
>> From: Yu Kuai <yukuai3 at huawei.com>
>> 
>> Fix patch is patch 27, relied patches are from:

I assume patch 27 is:

libfs: fix infinite directory reads for offset dir

https://lore.kernel.org/stable/20241024132225.2271667-12-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com/

I don't think the Maple tree patches are a hard
requirement for this fix. And note that libfs did
not use Maple tree originally because I was told
at that time that Maple tree was not yet mature.

So, a better approach might be to fit the fix
onto linux-6.6.y while sticking with xarray.

This is the first I've heard of this CVE. It
would help if the patch authors got some
notification when these are filed.


>> - patches from set [1] to add helpers to maple_tree, the last patch to
>> improve fork() performance is not backported;
> 
> So things slowed down?
> 
>> - patches from set [2] to change maple_tree, and follow up fixes;
>> - patches from set [3] to convert offset_ctx from xarray to maple_tree;
>> 
>> Please notice that I'm not an expert in this area, and I'm afraid to
>> make manual changes. That's why patch 16 revert the commit that is
>> different from mainline and will cause conflict backporting new patches.
>> patch 28 pick the original mainline patch again.
>> 
>> (And this is what we did to fix the CVE in downstream kernels).
>> 
>> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231027033845.90608-1-zhangpeng.00@bytedance.com/
>> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20231101171629.3612299-2-Liam.Howlett@oracle.com/T/
>> [3] https://lore.kernel.org/all/170820083431.6328.16233178852085891453.stgit@91.116.238.104.host.secureserver.net/
> 
> This series looks rough.  I want to have the maintainers of these
> files/subsystems to ack this before being able to take them.
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h

--
Chuck Lever




More information about the amd-gfx mailing list