[PATCH v2] drm/amdkfd: Not restore userptr buffer if kfd process has been removed
Chen, Xiaogang
xiaogang.chen at amd.com
Wed Oct 9 22:50:15 UTC 2024
On 10/9/2024 4:36 PM, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>
> On 2024-10-04 11:54, Xiaogang.Chen wrote:
>> From: Xiaogang Chen <xiaogang.chen at amd.com>
>>
>> When kfd process has been terminated not restore userptr buffer after
>> mmu
>> notifier invalidates a range.
>
> Is this fixing a real problem or a hypothetical problem? If there is a
> real problem, can you include more information here? It looks to me
> that amdgpu_amdkfd_restore_userptr_worker is already handling the
> cases where a process or mm_struct no longer exists. Maybe the only
> user visible change from this patch is, that you no longer print
> "Failed to quiesce KFD" in a corner case of an MMU notifier for a
> process that no longer exists?
>
> Or is there a problem with the lifetime of the process_info that
> contains the work_struct?
>
My thought was that restore userptr buffer is not needed anyway if the
correspondent kfd process has been removed. I noticed that during
another work. I do not see if still restoring userptr buffer would cause
issue when the kfd process not exist. Think avoid doing it is safer, and
not see there is regression.
Regards
Xiaogang
>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Xiaogang Chen<Xiaogang.Chen at amd.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c | 12 ++++++++----
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
>> index ce5ca304dba9..6b4be7893dfb 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_amdkfd_gpuvm.c
>> @@ -2524,11 +2524,15 @@ int amdgpu_amdkfd_evict_userptr(struct
>> mmu_interval_notifier *mni,
>> /* First eviction, stop the queues */
>> r = kgd2kfd_quiesce_mm(mni->mm,
>> KFD_QUEUE_EVICTION_TRIGGER_USERPTR);
>> - if (r)
>> +
>> + if (r && r != -ESRCH)
>> pr_err("Failed to quiesce KFD\n");
>> - queue_delayed_work(system_freezable_wq,
>> - &process_info->restore_userptr_work,
>> - msecs_to_jiffies(AMDGPU_USERPTR_RESTORE_DELAY_MS));
>> +
>> + if (r != -ESRCH) {
>
> Braces are not required because there is only one statement inside the
> if.
>
> Regards,
> Felix
>
>
>> + queue_delayed_work(system_freezable_wq,
>> + &process_info->restore_userptr_work,
>> + msecs_to_jiffies(AMDGPU_USERPTR_RESTORE_DELAY_MS));
>> + }
>> }
>> mutex_unlock(&process_info->notifier_lock);
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list