drm/amd/display: Introduce DML2
Li, Roman
Roman.Li at amd.com
Thu Oct 10 20:23:48 UTC 2024
[Public]
Hi Colin,
It's not critical since before the check:
p1_min_meta_chunk_bytes = min_meta_chunk_bytes;
Thanks,
Roman
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Colin King (gmail) <colin.i.king at gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2024 11:59 AM
> To: Zhuo, Lillian <Qingqing.Zhuo at amd.com>
> Cc: Siqueira, Rodrigo <Rodrigo.Siqueira at amd.com>; Li, Roman
> <Roman.Li at amd.com>; Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>;
> linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; amd-gfx mailing list <amd-
> gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>; amd-gfx mailing list <amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org>
> Subject: re: drm/amd/display: Introduce DML2
>
> Hi,
>
> Static analysis on linux-next has found a potential issue in function
> dml_rq_dlg_get_rq_reg in
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dml2/dml_display_rq_dlg_calc.c
>
> The issue is as follows:
>
> if (min_meta_chunk_bytes == 0)
> rq_regs->rq_regs_l.min_meta_chunk_size = 0;
> else
> rq_regs->rq_regs_l.min_meta_chunk_size =
> (dml_uint_t)(dml_log2((dml_float_t) min_meta_chunk_bytes) - 6 + 1);
>
> if ( == 0)
> rq_regs->rq_regs_c.min_meta_chunk_size = 0;
> else
> rq_regs->rq_regs_c.min_meta_chunk_size =
> (dml_uint_t)(dml_log2((dml_float_t) p1_min_meta_chunk_bytes) - 6 + 1);
>
> it appears that the second if statement is checking for min_meta_chunk_bytes == 0
> and I think it should be in fact checking for p1_min_meta_chunk_bytes == 0
> instead. I don't have the hardware so I can't test this hypothesis.
>
> Regards,
>
> Colin
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list