[PATCH v2] drm/sched: Further optimise drm_sched_entity_push_job
Christian König
ckoenig.leichtzumerken at gmail.com
Tue Sep 24 08:20:24 UTC 2024
Am 16.09.24 um 19:30 schrieb Tvrtko Ursulin:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at igalia.com>
>
> Having removed one re-lock cycle on the entity->lock in a patch titled
> "drm/sched: Optimise drm_sched_entity_push_job", with only a tiny bit
> larger refactoring we can do the same optimisation on the rq->lock.
> (Currently both drm_sched_rq_add_entity() and
> drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked() take and release the same lock.)
>
> To achieve this we make drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked() and
> drm_sched_rq_add_entity() expect the rq->lock to be held.
>
> We also align drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(),
> drm_sched_rq_add_entity() and
> drm_sched_rq_remove_fifo_locked() function signatures, by adding rq as a
> parameter to the latter.
>
> v2:
> * Fix after rebase of the series.
> * Avoid naming incosistency between drm_sched_rq_add/remove. (Christian)
>
> Signed-off-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin at igalia.com>
> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher at amd.com>
> Cc: Luben Tuikov <ltuikov89 at gmail.com>
> Cc: Matthew Brost <matthew.brost at intel.com>
> Cc: Philipp Stanner <pstanner at redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c | 12 ++++++++--
> drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c | 29 ++++++++++++------------
> include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h | 3 ++-
> 3 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> index d982cebc6bee..8ace1f1ea66b 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_entity.c
> @@ -515,9 +515,14 @@ struct drm_sched_job *drm_sched_entity_pop_job(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
>
> next = to_drm_sched_job(spsc_queue_peek(&entity->job_queue));
> if (next) {
> + struct drm_sched_rq *rq;
> +
> spin_lock(&entity->lock);
> - drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(entity,
> + rq = entity->rq;
> + spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> + drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(entity, rq,
> next->submit_ts);
> + spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> spin_unlock(&entity->lock);
> }
> }
> @@ -618,11 +623,14 @@ void drm_sched_entity_push_job(struct drm_sched_job *sched_job)
> sched = rq->sched;
>
> atomic_inc(sched->score);
> +
> + spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> drm_sched_rq_add_entity(rq, entity);
>
> if (drm_sched_policy == DRM_SCHED_POLICY_FIFO)
> - drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(entity, submit_ts);
> + drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(entity, rq, submit_ts);
>
> + spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> spin_unlock(&entity->lock);
>
> drm_sched_wakeup(sched, entity);
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> index 18a952f73ecb..5c83fb92bb89 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/scheduler/sched_main.c
> @@ -153,17 +153,18 @@ static __always_inline bool drm_sched_entity_compare_before(struct rb_node *a,
> return ktime_before(ent_a->oldest_job_waiting, ent_b->oldest_job_waiting);
> }
>
> -static inline void drm_sched_rq_remove_fifo_locked(struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
> +static void drm_sched_rq_remove_fifo_locked(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
> + struct drm_sched_rq *rq)
> {
> - struct drm_sched_rq *rq = entity->rq;
> -
> if (!RB_EMPTY_NODE(&entity->rb_tree_node)) {
> rb_erase_cached(&entity->rb_tree_node, &rq->rb_tree_root);
> RB_CLEAR_NODE(&entity->rb_tree_node);
> }
> }
>
> -void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, ktime_t ts)
> +void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
> + struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
> + ktime_t ts)
> {
> /*
> * Both locks need to be grabbed, one to protect from entity->rq change
> @@ -171,17 +172,14 @@ void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, ktime_t ts
> * other to update the rb tree structure.
> */
> lockdep_assert_held(&entity->lock);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
>
> - spin_lock(&entity->rq->lock);
> -
> - drm_sched_rq_remove_fifo_locked(entity);
> + drm_sched_rq_remove_fifo_locked(entity, rq);
>
> entity->oldest_job_waiting = ts;
>
> - rb_add_cached(&entity->rb_tree_node, &entity->rq->rb_tree_root,
> + rb_add_cached(&entity->rb_tree_node, &rq->rb_tree_root,
> drm_sched_entity_compare_before);
> -
> - spin_unlock(&entity->rq->lock);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -213,15 +211,14 @@ static void drm_sched_rq_init(struct drm_gpu_scheduler *sched,
> void drm_sched_rq_add_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
> struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
> {
> + lockdep_assert_held(&entity->lock);
> + lockdep_assert_held(&rq->lock);
> +
> if (!list_empty(&entity->list))
> return;
>
> - spin_lock(&rq->lock);
> -
> atomic_inc(rq->sched->score);
> list_add_tail(&entity->list, &rq->entities);
> -
> - spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> }
>
> /**
> @@ -235,6 +232,8 @@ void drm_sched_rq_add_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
> void drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
> struct drm_sched_entity *entity)
> {
> + lockdep_assert_held(&entity->lock);
> +
> if (list_empty(&entity->list))
> return;
>
> @@ -247,7 +246,7 @@ void drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
> rq->current_entity = NULL;
>
> if (drm_sched_policy == DRM_SCHED_POLICY_FIFO)
> - drm_sched_rq_remove_fifo_locked(entity);
> + drm_sched_rq_remove_fifo_locked(entity, rq);
>
> spin_unlock(&rq->lock);
> }
> diff --git a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> index 80198e6cf537..b21806d5a8eb 100644
> --- a/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> +++ b/include/drm/gpu_scheduler.h
> @@ -596,7 +596,8 @@ void drm_sched_rq_add_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
> void drm_sched_rq_remove_entity(struct drm_sched_rq *rq,
> struct drm_sched_entity *entity);
>
> -void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(struct drm_sched_entity *entity, ktime_t ts);
> +void drm_sched_rq_update_fifo_locked(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
> + struct drm_sched_rq *rq, ktime_t ts);
>
> int drm_sched_entity_init(struct drm_sched_entity *entity,
> enum drm_sched_priority priority,
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list