[PATCH V11 35/47] drm/colorop: Add 1D Curve Custom LUT type
Alex Hung
alex.hung at amd.com
Wed Aug 20 18:16:58 UTC 2025
On 8/19/25 09:31, Sebastian Wick wrote:
>> +/**
>> + * drm_plane_colorop_curve_1d_lut_init - Initialize a DRM_COLOROP_1D_LUT
>> + *
>> + * @dev: DRM device
>> + * @colorop: The drm_colorop object to initialize
>> + * @plane: The associated drm_plane
>> + * @lut_size: LUT size supported by driver
>> + * @return zero on success, -E value on failure
>> + */
>> +int drm_plane_colorop_curve_1d_lut_init(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_colorop *colorop,
>> + struct drm_plane *plane, uint32_t lut_size)
>> +{
>> + struct drm_property *prop;
>> + int ret;
>> +
>> + ret = drm_plane_colorop_init(dev, colorop, plane, DRM_COLOROP_1D_LUT);
>> + if (ret)
>> + return ret;
>> +
>> + /* initialize 1D LUT only attribute */
>> + /* LUT size */
>> + prop = drm_property_create_range(dev, DRM_MODE_PROP_IMMUTABLE | DRM_MODE_PROP_ATOMIC,
>> + "SIZE", 0, UINT_MAX);
>> + if (!prop)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + colorop->lut_size_property = prop;
> I'm a bit confused here. The property itself is just called "SIZE" which
> looks very similar to the generic "DATA" property. However, it is
> assigned to `lut_size_property`.
>
> Is this meant to be to be a generic property where the exact usage
> depends on the type of the color op (like "DATA"), or is this meant to
> be specific to LUTs (in which case the generic name is misleading)?
>
> I also tried to find the user space documentation for all the properties
> but could not find them. The only thing I could find was the kernel
> documentation of
>
> struct drm_property *lut_size_property;
>
> Which says "Size property for custom LUT from userspace."
In earlier version, this lut_size was specific to 1D LUT and 3D LUT has
a dedicate lut size field in another struct, and lut_size_property is
now used for both 1D and 3D LUTs.
Do you mean we clarify by making either changes?
1) "SIZE" to "LUT_SIZE"
-> specific to LUTs
2) "lut_size" and "lut_size_property" "size" and "size_property",
respectively
-> Can be reused in the future, if any.
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list