[PATCH V11 06/47] drm/colorop: Add 1D Curve subtype

[Pekka Paalanen]

On Thu, 21 Aug 2025 11:54:32 -0600
Alex Hung <alex.hung at amd.com> wrote:

> On 8/21/25 06:23, Xaver Hugl wrote:
> >> We user space folks have been convinced at this point that the sRGB EOTF
> >> is actually gamma 2.2, and not the piece-wise function. Now, if the
> >> hardware is actually the piece-wise, then that's what should be exposed,
> >> but I'm a bit unsure if we should do that under the name sRGB EOTF.  
> > Maybe simply rename the enum string to "sRGB piece-wise EOTF"? In
> > hindsight, the naming of "srgb" in the Wayland protocol caused a lot
> > of confusion, it's better to be explicit about it where possible.  
> 
> I will leave this to Harry to comment. He is taking a few days off so I 
> will check with him later.
> 

"sRGB inverse OETF"?

Strictly speaking "sRGB piece-wise EOTF" is not a thing AFAIU.


Thanks,
pq
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/amd-gfx/attachments/20250826/06e88055/attachment-0001.sig>