[RFC PATCH] amd/ttm: test fence->ops->signaled before use

Christian König christian.koenig at amd.com
Wed Jan 8 09:18:56 UTC 2025


Am 07.01.25 um 21:01 schrieb James Zhu:
> this original test condition is unclear.

No that is completely unnecessary.

The point is that with fence->ops->signaled provided the fence should 
make progress even without enabling signaling.

Why would you want to add this?

Regards,
Christian.

>
> Signed-off-by: James Zhu <James.Zhu at amd.com>
> ---
>   drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c | 2 +-
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> index 48c5365efca1..d40f07802c4f 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo.c
> @@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ static void ttm_bo_flush_all_fences(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo)
>   
>   	dma_resv_iter_begin(&cursor, resv, DMA_RESV_USAGE_BOOKKEEP);
>   	dma_resv_for_each_fence_unlocked(&cursor, fence) {
> -		if (!fence->ops->signaled)
> +		if (fence->ops->signaled && !fence->ops->signaled(fence))
>   			dma_fence_enable_sw_signaling(fence);
>   	}
>   	dma_resv_iter_end(&cursor);



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list