[RFC PATCH 10/13] drm/admgpu: make device state machine work in stack like way
Mario Limonciello
mario.limonciello at amd.com
Wed Jan 8 17:13:30 UTC 2025
On 1/8/2025 08:00, Jiang Liu wrote:
> Make the device state machine work in stack like way to better support
> suspend/resume by following changes:
>
> 1. amdgpu_driver_load_kms()
> amdgpu_device_init()
> amdgpu_device_ip_early_init()
> ip_blocks[i].early_init()
> ip_blocks[i].status.valid = true
> amdgpu_device_ip_init()
> amdgpu_ras_init()
> ip_blocks[i].sw_init()
> ip_blocks[i].status.sw = true
> ip_blocks[i].hw_init()
> ip_blocks[i].status.hw = true
> amdgpu_device_ip_late_init()
> ip_blocks[i].late_init()
> ip_blocks[i].status.late_initialized = true
> amdgpu_ras_late_init()
> ras_blocks[i].ras_late_init()
> amdgpu_ras_feature_enable_on_boot()
>
> 2. amdgpu_pmops_suspend()/amdgpu_pmops_freeze()/amdgpu_pmops_poweroff()
> amdgpu_device_suspend()
> amdgpu_ras_early_fini()
> ras_blocks[i].ras_early_fini()
> amdgpu_ras_feature_disable()
> amdgpu_ras_suspend()
> amdgpu_ras_disable_all_features()
> +++ ip_blocks[i].early_fini()
> +++ ip_blocks[i].status.late_initialized = false
> ip_blocks[i].suspend()
>
> 3. amdgpu_pmops_resume()/amdgpu_pmops_thaw()/amdgpu_pmops_restore()
> amdgpu_device_resume()
> amdgpu_device_ip_resume()
> ip_blocks[i].resume()
> amdgpu_device_ip_late_init()
> ip_blocks[i].late_init()
> ip_blocks[i].status.late_initialized = true
> amdgpu_ras_late_init()
> ras_blocks[i].ras_late_init()
> amdgpu_ras_feature_enable_on_boot()
> amdgpu_ras_resume()
> amdgpu_ras_enable_all_features()
>
> 4. amdgpu_driver_unload_kms()
> amdgpu_device_fini_hw()
> amdgpu_ras_early_fini()
> ras_blocks[i].ras_early_fini()
> +++ ip_blocks[i].early_fini()
> +++ ip_blocks[i].status.late_initialized = false
> ip_blocks[i].hw_fini()
> ip_blocks[i].status.hw = false
>
> 5. amdgpu_driver_release_kms()
> amdgpu_device_fini_sw()
> amdgpu_device_ip_fini()
> ip_blocks[i].sw_fini()
> ip_blocks[i].status.sw = false
> --- ip_blocks[i].status.valid = false
> +++ amdgpu_ras_fini()
> ip_blocks[i].late_fini()
> +++ ip_blocks[i].status.valid = false
> --- ip_blocks[i].status.late_initialized = false
> --- amdgpu_ras_fini()
>
> The main changes include:
> 1) invoke ip_blocks[i].early_fini in amdgpu_pmops_suspend().
> Currently there's only one ip block which provides `early_fini`
> callback. We have add a check of `in_s3` to keep current behavior in
> function amdgpu_dm_early_fini(). So there should be no functional
> changes.
FWIW You added more than just the in_s3 (which is correct, so update
commit message!).
> 2) set ip_blocks[i].status.late_initialized to false after calling
> callback `early_fini`. We have auditted all usages of the
> late_initialized flag and no functional changes found.
> 3) only set ip_blocks[i].status.valid = false after calling the
> `late_fini` callback.
> 4) call amdgpu_ras_fini() before invoking ip_blocks[i].late_fini.
>
> There's one more task left to analyze GPU reset related state machine
> transitions.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <gerry at linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++--
> .../gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c | 3 +++
> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> index 36a33a391411..5c6b39e5cdaa 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c
> @@ -3411,6 +3411,8 @@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> adev->ip_blocks[i].status.sw = false;
> }
>
> + amdgpu_ras_fini(adev);
> +
> for (i = adev->num_ip_blocks - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> if (!adev->ip_blocks[i].status.valid)
> continue;
> @@ -3419,8 +3421,6 @@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_fini(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> adev->ip_blocks[i].status.valid = false;
> }
>
> - amdgpu_ras_fini(adev);
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -3478,6 +3478,24 @@ static int amdgpu_device_ip_suspend_phase1(struct amdgpu_device *adev)
> if (amdgpu_dpm_set_df_cstate(adev, DF_CSTATE_DISALLOW))
> dev_warn(adev->dev, "Failed to disallow df cstate");
>
> + for (i = adev->num_ip_blocks - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
This is the 37th time we have a for loop that walks the IP blocks.
I'm thinking it would be good to have for_each_ip_block macro, what do
you think?
> + if (!adev->ip_blocks[i].status.valid)
> + continue;
> + if (!adev->ip_blocks[i].status.late_initialized)
> + continue;
If you take my idea in the cover letter of moving the state machine into
a single variable I think that some of these cases can be a little bit
cleaner. IE if it was never valid it wouldn't have progressed to 'hw'
or 'sw' states.
This check (and other similar ones) could turn into something like this:
if (adev->ip_blocks[i].status != AMDGPU_STATE_LATE_INIT)
continue;
> +
> + if (adev->ip_blocks[i].version->funcs->early_fini) {
> + r = adev->ip_blocks[i].version->funcs->early_fini(&adev->ip_blocks[i]);
> + if (r) {
> + DRM_ERROR(" of IP block <%s> failed %d\n",
> + adev->ip_blocks[i].version->funcs->name, r);
> + return r;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + adev->ip_blocks[i].status.late_initialized = false;
> + }
> +
> for (i = adev->num_ip_blocks - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
> if (!adev->ip_blocks[i].status.valid)
> continue;
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> index f622eb1551df..33a1a795c761 100755
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/amdgpu_dm/amdgpu_dm.c
> @@ -2175,6 +2175,9 @@ static int amdgpu_dm_early_fini(struct amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
> {
> struct amdgpu_device *adev = ip_block->adev;
>
> + if (adev->in_s0ix || adev->in_s3 || adev->in_s4 || adev->in_suspend)
> + return 0;
> +
I think this set of changes to display code (amdgpu_dm) should split to
it's own patch and stand on it's own.
> amdgpu_dm_audio_fini(adev);
>
> return 0;
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list