[PATCH v4] drm/amdkfd: Fix partial migrate issue
Deng, Emily
Emily.Deng at amd.com
Mon Jan 13 02:02:10 UTC 2025
[AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only]
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chen, Xiaogang <Xiaogang.Chen at amd.com>
>Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2025 2:13 AM
>To: Yang, Philip <Philip.Yang at amd.com>; Deng, Emily <Emily.Deng at amd.com>;
>amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] drm/amdkfd: Fix partial migrate issue
>
>
>On 1/10/2025 11:33 AM, Philip Yang wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2025-01-10 11:23, Chen, Xiaogang wrote:
>>>
>>> On 1/10/2025 8:37 AM, Philip Yang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2025-01-10 02:49, Emily Deng wrote:
>>>>> For partial migrate from ram to vram, the migrate->cpages is not
>>>>> equal to migrate->npages, should use migrate->npages to check all
>>>>> needed migrate pages which could be copied or not.
>>>>>
>>>>> And only need to set those pages could be migrated to
>>>>> migrate->dst[i], or
>>>>> the migrate_vma_pages will migrate the wrong pages based on the
>>>>> migrate->dst[i].
>>>>>
>>>>> v2:
>>>>> Add mpages to break the loop earlier.
>>>>>
>>>>> v3:
>>>>> Uses MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE to identify whether page could be migrated.
>>>>
>>>> The error handling need below change, with that fixed, this patch is
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Philip Yang<Philip.Yang at amd.com>
>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Emily Deng<Emily.Deng at amd.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c | 17 ++++++++++-------
>>>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
>>>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
>>>>> index 4b275937d05e..bfaccabeb3a0 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_migrate.c
>>>>> @@ -278,10 +278,11 @@ svm_migrate_copy_to_vram(struct kfd_node
>>>>> *node, struct svm_range *prange,
>>>>> struct migrate_vma *migrate, struct dma_fence
>>>>> **mfence,
>>>>> dma_addr_t *scratch, uint64_t ttm_res_offset)
>>>>> {
>>>>> - uint64_t npages = migrate->cpages;
>>>>> + uint64_t npages = migrate->npages;
>>>>> struct amdgpu_device *adev = node->adev;
>>>>> struct device *dev = adev->dev;
>>>>> struct amdgpu_res_cursor cursor;
>>>>> + uint64_t mpages = 0;
>>>>> dma_addr_t *src;
>>>>> uint64_t *dst;
>>>>> uint64_t i, j;
>>>>> @@ -295,14 +296,16 @@ svm_migrate_copy_to_vram(struct kfd_node
>>>>> *node, struct svm_range *prange,
>>>>> amdgpu_res_first(prange->ttm_res, ttm_res_offset,
>>>>> npages << PAGE_SHIFT, &cursor);
>>>>> - for (i = j = 0; i < npages; i++) {
>>>>> + for (i = j = 0; (i < npages) && (mpages < migrate->cpages);
>>>>> i++) {
>>>>> struct page *spage;
>>>>> - dst[i] = cursor.start + (j << PAGE_SHIFT);
>>>>> - migrate->dst[i] = svm_migrate_addr_to_pfn(adev, dst[i]);
>>>>> - svm_migrate_get_vram_page(prange, migrate->dst[i]);
>>>>> - migrate->dst[i] = migrate_pfn(migrate->dst[i]);
>>>>> -
>>>>> + if (migrate->src[i] & MIGRATE_PFN_MIGRATE) {
>>>>> + dst[i] = cursor.start + (j << PAGE_SHIFT);
>>>>> + migrate->dst[i] = svm_migrate_addr_to_pfn(adev,
>>>>> +dst[i]);
>>>>> + svm_migrate_get_vram_page(prange, migrate->dst[i]);
>>>>> + migrate->dst[i] = migrate_pfn(migrate->dst[i]);
>>>>> + mpages++;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> spage = migrate_pfn_to_page(migrate->src[i]);
>>>>> if (spage && !is_zone_device_page(spage)) {
>>>>> src[i] = dma_map_page(dev, spage, 0, PAGE_SIZE,
>>>> out_free_vram_pages:
>>>> if (r) {
>>>> pr_debug("failed %d to copy memory to vram\n", r);
>>>> - while (i--) {
>>>> +
>>>> + for (i = 0; i < npages && mpages; i++) {
>>>> + if (!dst[i])
>>>> + continue;
>>>> svm_migrate_put_vram_page(adev, dst[i]);
>>>> migrate->dst[i] = 0;
>>>> + mpages--;
>>>> }
>>>> }
>>>
>>> This error handing not need recover all vram pages as error happened
>>> at middle. Can use se do {....} while(i--);
>> no, for example migrate npage=cpage=4, and outside for loop,
>> svm_migrate_copy_memory_gart failed, dst[4] is out of range access.
>
>You are right, but it is awkward. Inside loop we update dst[i] before do sdam that does
>not include the dst[i] just updated.
As the dst[i] is already initialized to NULL, so I think it doesn't matter if use follow:
while (i--) {
if (dst[i])
svm_migrate_put_vram_page(adev, dst[i]);
migrate->dst[i] = 0;
}
Emily Deng
Best Wishes
>
>Regard
>
>Xiaogang
>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Xiaogang
>>>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list