[PATCH 2/7] drm/amdgpu: Add ring reset callback for JPEG4_0_3

Sundararaju, Sathishkumar sasundar at amd.com
Fri Jan 31 16:40:55 UTC 2025


Hi Christian,


On 1/31/2025 9:56 PM, Christian König wrote:
> Am 31.01.25 um 17:23 schrieb Sathishkumar S:
>> Add ring reset function callback for JPEG4_0_3 to
>> recover from job timeouts without a full gpu reset.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sathishkumar S <sathishkumar.sundararaju at amd.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v4_0_3.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>   1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v4_0_3.c 
>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v4_0_3.c
>> index be0b3b4c8690..62d8628dccc5 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v4_0_3.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v4_0_3.c
>> @@ -204,9 +204,7 @@ static int jpeg_v4_0_3_sw_init(struct 
>> amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
>>       if (r)
>>           return r;
>>   -    /* TODO: Add queue reset mask when FW fully supports it */
>> -    adev->jpeg.supported_reset =
>> - amdgpu_get_soft_full_reset_mask(&adev->jpeg.inst[0].ring_dec[0]);
>> +    adev->jpeg.supported_reset = AMDGPU_RESET_TYPE_PER_PIPE;
>>       r = amdgpu_jpeg_sysfs_reset_mask_init(adev);
>>       if (r)
>>           return r;
>> @@ -231,6 +229,7 @@ static int jpeg_v4_0_3_sw_fini(struct 
>> amdgpu_ip_block *ip_block)
>>           return r;
>>         amdgpu_jpeg_sysfs_reset_mask_fini(adev);
>> +
>>       r = amdgpu_jpeg_sw_fini(adev);
>>         return r;
>> @@ -1099,6 +1098,60 @@ static int 
>> jpeg_v4_0_3_process_interrupt(struct amdgpu_device *adev,
>>       return 0;
>>   }
>>   +static int jpeg_v4_0_3_wait_for_idle_on_inst(struct amdgpu_ring 
>> *ring)
>> +{
>> +    struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
>> +    struct amdgpu_ring *r;
>> +    int ret, j;
>> +
>> +    for (j = 0; j < adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings; ++j) {
>> +        r = &adev->jpeg.inst[ring->me].ring_dec[j];
>> +        r->sched.ready = false;
>> +    }
>> +    /* publish update */
>> +    smp_rmb();
>
> Using smp_rmb() to publish the update is 100% incorrect.
>
> What exactly are you trying to do?
On JPEG4_0_3, there are possibly multiple contexts submitting jobs to 
all cores on the affected instance,
so I am changing sched_ready to false and using smp_rmb() to publish to 
other cores which are trying to
submit on this instance , for them to read the updated change 
immediately and stop submission before
I wait for idle on this instance, which makes sure other good contexts 
of jpeg get a chance to be migrated
out to any available instance before reset starts, that way good jpeg 
contexts get a chance to continue
without issues while this instance is being reset and made ready to 
continue decoding after reset.

Regards,
Sathish
>
> Regards,
> Christian.
>
>
>> +    for (j = 0; j < adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings; ++j) {
>> +        r = &adev->jpeg.inst[ring->me].ring_dec[j];
>> +        if (r->pipe == j)
>> +            continue;
>> +        ret = SOC15_WAIT_ON_RREG_OFFSET(JPEG, GET_INST(JPEG, ring->me),
>> +                        regUVD_JRBC0_UVD_JRBC_STATUS,
>> +                        jpeg_v4_0_3_core_reg_offset(j),
>> + UVD_JRBC0_UVD_JRBC_STATUS__RB_JOB_DONE_MASK,
>> + UVD_JRBC0_UVD_JRBC_STATUS__RB_JOB_DONE_MASK);
>> +        if (ret)
>> +            return ret;
>> +    }
>> +
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int jpeg_v4_0_3_ring_reset(struct amdgpu_ring *ring, unsigned 
>> int vmid)
>> +{
>> +    struct amdgpu_device *adev = ring->adev;
>> +    struct amdgpu_ring *r;
>> +    int ret, j;
>> +
>> +    if (amdgpu_sriov_vf(adev))
>> +        return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +    jpeg_v4_0_3_wait_for_idle_on_inst(ring);
>> +    jpeg_v4_0_3_stop_inst(ring->adev, ring->me);
>> +    jpeg_v4_0_3_start_inst(ring->adev, ring->me);
>> +    for (j = 0; j < adev->jpeg.num_jpeg_rings; ++j) {
>> +        r = &adev->jpeg.inst[ring->me].ring_dec[j];
>> +        jpeg_v4_0_3_start_jrbc(r);
>> +        ret = amdgpu_ring_test_helper(r);
>> +        if (ret)
>> +            return ret;
>> +        r->sched.ready = true;
>> +    }
>> +    /* publish update */
>> +    smp_rmb();
>> +    dev_info(adev->dev, "Reset on %s succeeded\n", ring->sched.name);
>> +    return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>   static const struct amd_ip_funcs jpeg_v4_0_3_ip_funcs = {
>>       .name = "jpeg_v4_0_3",
>>       .early_init = jpeg_v4_0_3_early_init,
>> @@ -1145,6 +1198,7 @@ static const struct amdgpu_ring_funcs 
>> jpeg_v4_0_3_dec_ring_vm_funcs = {
>>       .emit_wreg = jpeg_v4_0_3_dec_ring_emit_wreg,
>>       .emit_reg_wait = jpeg_v4_0_3_dec_ring_emit_reg_wait,
>>       .emit_reg_write_reg_wait = 
>> amdgpu_ring_emit_reg_write_reg_wait_helper,
>> +    .reset = jpeg_v4_0_3_ring_reset,
>>   };
>>     static void jpeg_v4_0_3_set_dec_ring_funcs(struct amdgpu_device 
>> *adev)
>



More information about the amd-gfx mailing list