[PATCH v3 2/5] drm/amdgpu: don't sync the user queue eviction fence
Christian König
christian.koenig at amd.com
Tue May 6 08:23:02 UTC 2025
On 5/6/25 04:09, Liang, Prike wrote:
> [Public]
>
>> From: Koenig, Christian <Christian.Koenig at amd.com>
>> Sent: Wednesday, April 30, 2025 7:57 PM
>> To: Liang, Prike <Prike.Liang at amd.com>; amd-gfx at lists.freedesktop.org
>> Cc: Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher at amd.com>
>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] drm/amdgpu: don't sync the user queue eviction
>> fence
>>
>> On 4/30/25 04:40, Prike Liang wrote:
>>> Don't return and sync the user queue eviction fence; otherwise, the
>>> eviction fence will be returned as a dependent fence during VM update
>>> and refer to the fence result in leakage.
>>
>> Please drop that patch, it shouldn't be needed any more after the changes in
>> patch #1.
>
> Yes, may I get patch#1( drm/amdgpu: promote the implicit sync to the dependent read fences) reviewed?
Sorry, I thought I've already done that.
Feel free to add Reviewed-by: Christian König <christian.koenig at amd.com> to that patch.
Regards,
Christian.
>
>
>> Regards,
>> Christian.
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Prike Liang <Prike.Liang at amd.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.c | 11 +++++++++++
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.h | 1 +
>>> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sync.c | 4 ++++
>>> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.c
>>> index d86e611a9ff4..6c9b2b43a929 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.c
>>> @@ -224,6 +224,17 @@ void amdgpu_eviction_fence_detach(struct
>> amdgpu_eviction_fence_mgr *evf_mgr,
>>> dma_fence_put(stub);
>>> }
>>>
>>> +bool amdgpu_eviction_fence_valid(struct dma_fence *f) {
>>> +
>>> + if(!f)
>>> + return false;
>>> + if (f->ops == &amdgpu_eviction_fence_ops)
>>> + return true;
>>> +
>>> + return false;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> int amdgpu_eviction_fence_init(struct amdgpu_eviction_fence_mgr
>>> *evf_mgr) {
>>> /* This needs to be done one time per open */ diff --git
>>> a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.h
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.h
>>> index fcd867b7147d..d4e1975cac71 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.h
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_eviction_fence.h
>>> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ struct amdgpu_eviction_fence_mgr { };
>>>
>>> /* Eviction fence helper functions */
>>> +bool amdgpu_eviction_fence_valid(struct dma_fence *f);
>>> struct amdgpu_eviction_fence *
>>> amdgpu_eviction_fence_create(struct amdgpu_eviction_fence_mgr
>>> *evf_mgr);
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sync.c
>>> b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sync.c
>>> index d6ae9974c952..8ac685eb1be1 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sync.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_sync.c
>>> @@ -185,6 +185,10 @@ static bool amdgpu_sync_test_fence(struct
>>> amdgpu_device *adev, {
>>> void *fence_owner = amdgpu_sync_get_owner(f);
>>>
>>> + /* don't sync the kgd userq eviction fence*/
>>> + if(amdgpu_eviction_fence_valid(f))
>>> + return false;
>>> +
>>> /* Always sync to moves, no matter what */
>>> if (fence_owner == AMDGPU_FENCE_OWNER_UNDEFINED)
>>> return true;
>
More information about the amd-gfx
mailing list