<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> <meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)"> <style></style> </head> <body bgcolor="white" lang="EN-US" link="blue" vlink="purple"> <div class="WordSection1"> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0in 0in 0in 4.0pt"> <div> <div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in"> <p class="MsoNormal"><b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext">From:</span></b><span style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif";color:windowtext"> amd-gfx [mailto:amd-gfx-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org] <b>On Behalf Of </b>Christian König<br> <b>Sent:</b> Wednesday, June 14, 2017 12:37 PM<br> <b>To:</b> Alexandre Demers; Freedesktop - AMD-gfx<br> <b>Subject:</b> Re: Question about porting VCE1 to amdgpu<o:p></o:p></span></p> </div> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> <div> <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt"> <p class="MsoNormal">- Would we need a different firmware version with a different "hdr" for the amdgpu driver?<o:p></o:p></p> </blockquote> <p class="MsoNormal">Yes, we should probably release the latest one instead of reusing the one used with radeon.<br> <br> <span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Actually, we should probably stick the same one as radeon for now until we can verify the new firmware in general. Easier to start with a known working case.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><br> BTW: Does VCE work on CIK? Alex, don't we run into the same issue there as well?<br> <br> <span style="color:#1F497D"><o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">VCE works on CIK. We ported VCE and UVD to CIK as part of the initial amdgpu bring up.<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D"><o:p> </o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";color:#1F497D">Alex<o:p></o:p></span></p> <p class="MsoNormal"><br> <br> <o:p></o:p></p> <div> <p class="MsoNormal">- Wouldn't it be better to continue loading the driver while having VCE disabled IF we fail when loading or validating the FW? Completely failing to load the driver for this reason seems overkill IMO, since nothing has been loaded in memory and no registry have been modified up to that point.<o:p></o:p></p> </div> <p class="MsoNormal">UVD and VCE are actually needed for correct power management. When the blocks fail to initialize you usually sooner or later run into problems with power management (e.g. stuck inside a certain power level).<br> <br> <br> <o:p></o:p></p> <div> <p class="MsoNormal">- Would it be a good idea to send a patch as a RFC so some of you could help me finish the job and maybe pinpoint where the last modifications need to be done?<o:p></o:p></p> </div> <p class="MsoNormal">Well you could, but to be honest without AMD releasing new firmware that is most likely a futile effort.<br> <br> Regards,<br> Christian.<br> <br> Am 14.06.2017 um 18:22 schrieb Alexandre Demers:<o:p></o:p></p> </div> <blockquote style="margin-top:5.0pt;margin-bottom:5.0pt"> <div> <p class="MsoNormal">Hi, <o:p></o:p></p> <div> <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class="MsoNormal">I've been working on porting VCE1 from radeon to amdgpu in the last few weeks. I'm pretty much done and I've enabled the functionality to see how it goes. However, I ended up with an error on the firmware validation (size doesn't seem to fit), thus failing completely in loading the driver. I'm testing on a R9 280X (Tahiti).<o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class="MsoNormal">Three questions then:<o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class="MsoNormal">- Would we need a different firmware version with a different "hdr" for the amdgpu driver?<o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class="MsoNormal">- Wouldn't it be better to continue loading the driver while having VCE disabled IF we fail when loading or validating the FW? Completely failing to load the driver for this reason seems overkill IMO, since nothing has been loaded in memory and no registry have been modified up to that point.<o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class="MsoNormal">- Would it be a good idea to send a patch as a RFC so some of you could help me finish the job and maybe pinpoint where the last modifications need to be done?<o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class="MsoNormal">Thank you!<o:p></o:p></p> </div> <div> <p class="MsoNormal">Alexandre Demers<o:p></o:p></p> </div> </div> <p class="MsoNormal"><br> <br> <br> <o:p></o:p></p> <pre>_______________________________________________<o:p></o:p></pre> <pre>amd-gfx mailing list<o:p></o:p></pre> <pre><a href="mailto:amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org">amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org</a><o:p></o:p></pre> <pre><a href="https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx">https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/amd-gfx</a><o:p></o:p></pre> </blockquote> <p><o:p> </o:p></p> </div> </div> </body> </html>