<html><head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"> </head> <body> Ping Andrey <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 2022-05-13 11:41, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote: </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:0b2657b0-41b6-53b1-f087-1fa0fb821839@amd.com"> <blockquote type="cite" style="color: #007cff;">Yes, exactly that's the idea. Basically the reset domain knowns which amdgpu devices it needs to reset together. If you then represent that so that you always have a hive even when you only have one device in it, or if you put an array of devices which needs to be reset together into the reset domain doesn't matter. Maybe go for the later approach, that is probably a bit cleaner and less code to change. Christian. </blockquote> Unfortunately this approach raises also a few difficulties - First - if holding array of devices in reset_domain then when you come to GPU reset function you don't really know which adev is the one triggered the reset and this is actually essential to some procedures like emergency restart. Second - in XGMI case we must take into account that one of the hive members might go away in runtime (i could do echo 1 > /sysfs/pci_id/remove on it for example at any moment) - so now we need to maintain this array and mark such entry with NULL probably on XGMI node removal , and then there might be hot insertion and all this adds more complications. I now tend to prefer your initial solution for it's simplicity and the result will be what we need - "E.g. in the reset code (either before or after the reset, that's debatable) you do something like this: for (i = 0; i < num_ring; ++i) cancel_delayed_work(ring[i]->scheduler....) cancel_work(adev->ras_work); cancel_work(adev->iofault_work); cancel_work(adev->debugfs_work); " Let me know what you think. Andrey </blockquote> </body> </html>