<!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> </head> <body> Thx, but in that case this patch here then won't help either it just mitigates the problem. Can you try to reduce num_hw_submission for the MES ring? Thanks, Christian. <div class="moz-cite-prefix">Am 22.07.24 um 05:27 schrieb Xiao, Jack: </div> <blockquote type="cite" cite="mid:PH8PR12MB68417B9F856C92BD02912A08EFA82@PH8PR12MB6841.namprd12.prod.outlook.com"> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8"> <style type="text/css" style="display:none;">P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}</style> [AMD Official Use Only - AMD Internal Distribution Only] <div> <div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> >> I think we rather need to increase the MES ring size instead.</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> </div> <div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Unfortunately, it doesn't work. I guess mes firmware has limitation.</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> </div> <div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Regards,</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> Jack</div> <div class="elementToProof" style="font-family: Aptos, Aptos_EmbeddedFont, Aptos_MSFontService, Calibri, Helvetica, sans-serif; font-size: 12pt; color: rgb(0, 0, 0);"> </div> <hr style="display:inline-block;width:98%" tabindex="-1"> <div id="divRplyFwdMsg" dir="ltr">From: Christian König <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com"><ckoenig.leichtzumerken@gmail.com></a> Sent: Friday, 19 July 2024 23:44 To: Xiao, Jack <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Jack.Xiao@amd.com"><Jack.Xiao@amd.com></a>; <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org">amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org</a> <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"><amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org></a>; Deucher, Alexander <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Alexander.Deucher@amd.com"><Alexander.Deucher@amd.com></a> Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amdgpu/mes: fix mes ring buffer overflow <div> </div> </div> <div class="BodyFragment"> <div class="PlainText">Am 19.07.24 um 11:16 schrieb Jack Xiao: > wait memory room until enough before writing mes packets > to avoid ring buffer overflow. > > Signed-off-by: Jack Xiao <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:Jack.Xiao@amd.com"><Jack.Xiao@amd.com></a> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v12_0.c | 18 ++++++++++++++---- > 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c > index 8ce51b9236c1..68c74adf79f1 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v11_0.c > @@ -168,7 +168,7 @@ static int mes_v11_0_submit_pkt_and_poll_completion(struct amdgpu_mes *mes, > const char *op_str, *misc_op_str; > unsigned long flags; > u64 status_gpu_addr; > - u32 status_offset; > + u32 seq, status_offset; > u64 *status_ptr; > signed long r; > int ret; > @@ -196,6 +196,13 @@ static int mes_v11_0_submit_pkt_and_poll_completion(struct amdgpu_mes *mes, > if (r) > goto error_unlock_free; > > + seq = ++ring->fence_drv.sync_seq; > + r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, > + seq - ring->fence_drv.num_fences_mask, > + timeout); > + if (r < 1) > + goto error_undo; > + > api_status = (struct MES_API_STATUS *)((char *)pkt + api_status_off); > api_status->api_completion_fence_addr = status_gpu_addr; > api_status->api_completion_fence_value = 1; > @@ -208,8 +215,7 @@ static int mes_v11_0_submit_pkt_and_poll_completion(struct amdgpu_mes *mes, > mes_status_pkt.header.dwsize = API_FRAME_SIZE_IN_DWORDS; > mes_status_pkt.api_status.api_completion_fence_addr = > ring->fence_drv.gpu_addr; > - mes_status_pkt.api_status.api_completion_fence_value = > - ++ring->fence_drv.sync_seq; > + mes_status_pkt.api_status.api_completion_fence_value = seq; > > amdgpu_ring_write_multiple(ring, &mes_status_pkt, > sizeof(mes_status_pkt) / 4); > @@ -229,7 +235,7 @@ static int mes_v11_0_submit_pkt_and_poll_completion(struct amdgpu_mes *mes, > dev_dbg(adev->dev, "MES msg=%d was emitted\n", > x_pkt->header.opcode); > > - r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, ring->fence_drv.sync_seq, timeout); > + r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq, timeout); > if (r < 1 || !*status_ptr) { > > if (misc_op_str) > @@ -252,6 +258,10 @@ static int mes_v11_0_submit_pkt_and_poll_completion(struct amdgpu_mes *mes, > amdgpu_device_wb_free(adev, status_offset); > return 0; > > +error_undo: > + dev_err(adev->dev, "MES ring buffer is full.\n"); > + amdgpu_ring_undo(ring); > + > error_unlock_free: > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mes->ring_lock, flags); > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v12_0.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v12_0.c > index c9f74231ad59..48e01206bcc4 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v12_0.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/mes_v12_0.c > @@ -154,7 +154,7 @@ static int mes_v12_0_submit_pkt_and_poll_completion(struct amdgpu_mes *mes, > const char *op_str, *misc_op_str; > unsigned long flags; > u64 status_gpu_addr; > - u32 status_offset; > + u32 seq, status_offset; > u64 *status_ptr; > signed long r; > int ret; > @@ -182,6 +182,13 @@ static int mes_v12_0_submit_pkt_and_poll_completion(struct amdgpu_mes *mes, > if (r) > goto error_unlock_free; > > + seq = ++ring->fence_drv.sync_seq; > + r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, > + seq - ring->fence_drv.num_fences_mask, That's what's amdgpu_fence_emit_polling() does anyway. So this here just moves the polling a bit earlier. I think we rather need to increase the MES ring size instead. Regards, Christian. > + timeout); > + if (r < 1) > + goto error_undo; > + > api_status = (struct MES_API_STATUS *)((char *)pkt + api_status_off); > api_status->api_completion_fence_addr = status_gpu_addr; > api_status->api_completion_fence_value = 1; > @@ -194,8 +201,7 @@ static int mes_v12_0_submit_pkt_and_poll_completion(struct amdgpu_mes *mes, > mes_status_pkt.header.dwsize = API_FRAME_SIZE_IN_DWORDS; > mes_status_pkt.api_status.api_completion_fence_addr = > ring->fence_drv.gpu_addr; > - mes_status_pkt.api_status.api_completion_fence_value = > - ++ring->fence_drv.sync_seq; > + mes_status_pkt.api_status.api_completion_fence_value = seq; > > amdgpu_ring_write_multiple(ring, &mes_status_pkt, > sizeof(mes_status_pkt) / 4); > @@ -215,7 +221,7 @@ static int mes_v12_0_submit_pkt_and_poll_completion(struct amdgpu_mes *mes, > dev_dbg(adev->dev, "MES msg=%d was emitted\n", > x_pkt->header.opcode); > > - r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, ring->fence_drv.sync_seq, timeout); > + r = amdgpu_fence_wait_polling(ring, seq, timeout); > if (r < 1 || !*status_ptr) { > > if (misc_op_str) > @@ -238,6 +244,10 @@ static int mes_v12_0_submit_pkt_and_poll_completion(struct amdgpu_mes *mes, > amdgpu_device_wb_free(adev, status_offset); > return 0; > > +error_undo: > + dev_err(adev->dev, "MES ring buffer is full.\n"); > + amdgpu_ring_undo(ring); > + > error_unlock_free: > spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mes->ring_lock, flags); > </div> </div> </div> </blockquote> </body> </html>