<!DOCTYPE html>
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font face="monospace">On 7/20/25
17:45, Alex Deucher wrote:</font><span
style="white-space: pre-wrap">
</span></div>
<blockquote type="cite"
cite="mid:CADnq5_Mpsd_68T3uKqdXzHSzm4dWcHamYJZMNpPNZFHBp=DORQ@mail.gmail.com">
<pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">
DP (and all of its variants, eDP, USB-C thunderbolt) doesn't actually
use i2c directly. It's aux; you can do i2c over aux, but in the case
of MST, it's more like a network for displays so naively messing with
i2c buses from userspace won't do what you expect. For MST, you have
a single set of i2c/aux pins for the connector which may have several
monitors on the other end.</pre>
<pre wrap="" class="moz-quote-pre">
DP is a two way communications channel. You may have the driver
training a link or communicating with other devices on the DP network
(MST hubs, monitors, etc.). You can also get requests from the
monitor to the driver via hpd interrupts. Many of these processes do
not do well if interrupted.
Alex
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
<font face="monospace">I get that this is a part of a very
complicated protocol. I am still irritated that the points you
mention are relevant from the perspective of userspace. From my
perspective there is no expectation that the kernel should just
interrupt ongoing procedures when I access an i2c link. I am happy
to wait for the kernel to schedule the operation for when it is
convenient. After all the point of abstraction is not having to
worry about the layers underneath. And if the drm device exposes
an i2c device that I access it is the job of the drm driver to
handle how and when that transmission takes place. <br>
<br>
Also I would like to point out that the bug I am experiencing does
not materialize in case of any external displays attached via an
MST hub. It happens with the internal display even when nothing is
attached. The point about MST Hubs is only relevant because those
i2c interface can not be matched via udev to the corresponding
display. Though the can be matched when reading edid from the
device. Those interfaces then work just fine when I use ddc to
read/set monitor inputs. So those points do not seem to really be
relevant in case of the screen freezing trigger.<br>
<br>
Anyway that is just my thoughts on the matter. I'll look into
writing a workaround to maybe avoid some i2c devices that could be
problematic.<br>
<br>
And there still might be a relation to the other screen freezing
issues.<br>
<br>
Felix</font>
</body>
</html>