qapitrace feedback on additional Call groups

[José Fonseca]

Lawrence,

I see some value in this when analyzing traces from third-parties (eg, when
qapitrace being used by OpenGL implementator to debug), but this might
interfer with the application's glPush/PopDebugGroup calls (ie, qapitrace
being used by OpenGL application developer).

It might acutually hinder comprehension as everything will look the same
when collapsed.

Could this implemented as an option?

Jose


On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 1:47 AM, Lawrence Love <lawlove at gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not sure of the procedure - if a pull request is in order for feedback
> - but I have a commit I'd like to get feedback on for adding an extra level
> of branching for grouping calls into Render blocks and State changes blocks
> in addition to the existing glPush/PopDebugGroup groups. I've put the
> details in the commit message
> <https://github.com/lawlove/apitrace/commit/ad84ca057aa3ce007513560a78024bb6202b8375> and
> here is the repository:
>
> https://github.com/lawlove/apitrace/tree/gui-add-render-and-state-groups
>
> Also attached is a screen shot.
>
> Thanks,
> Larry
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> apitrace mailing list
> apitrace at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/apitrace
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/apitrace/attachments/20141212/b0af070d/attachment.html>