[Authentication] Using PropertiesChanged instead of our own signals?
Stef Walter
stefw at gnome.org
Tue Jan 31 06:01:26 PST 2012
Hi there.
I've been working on GObject style bindings for the Secret Service API.
One thing I noticed was that the standard PropertiesChanged dbus signal
covers the use cases for all of our custom signals in the Secret Service
API:
* CollectionCreated
* CollectionDeleted
* CollectionChanged
* ItemCreated
* ItemDeleted
* ItemChanged
In fact the Secret Service was spec'd out before the PropertiesChanged
signal became part of the dbus standard. In gnome-keyring we haven't yet
implemented these signals.
Have you in ksecretservice used these signals or do you use
PropertiesChanged?
If we're not yet committed to the above signals, I would suggest
changing to PropertiesChanged for simplicity and clarity. WDYT?
Cheers,
Stef
More information about the Authentication
mailing list