[Beignet] possilbe bug when run opencv_test_imgproc

[yan.wang at linux.intel.com]

Before leaving office, I have built the latest beignet. I will try it
again tomorrow.
Thanks.

Yan Wang

> Can't reproduce it here. Did you use the latest git master?
>
> The latest git version is
> commit 33a043e903f9d61445d3fb7972becf83c2842276
> Author: Junyan He <junyan.he at linux.intel.com>
> Date:   Thu Oct 23 13:09:00 2014 +0800
>
>     Add the disasm support for Gen8
>
>     Signed-off-by: Junyan He <junyan.he at linux.intel.com>
>     Reviewed-by: Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong at linux.intel.com>
>     Reviewed-by: "Yang, Rong R" <rong.r.yang at intel.com>
>
>
> Just a reminder, when report a bug/issue, please update to the latest git
> master version and test it again and if it could reproduce please write
> done the git hash in the report.
>
> Thanks,
> Zhigang Gong.
>
> On Thu, Oct 23, 2014 at 03:24:01AM -0700, yan.wang at linux.intel.com wrote:
>> Hi, All,
>>    I found one possible bug for review.
>>    if run the following:
>> ./opencv_test_imgproc --gtest_filter=OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat*.
>>    OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256 failed and continue. But the whole
>> test
>> flow will crash in OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257:
>> [  FAILED  ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/240, where GetParam() = (CV_8U,
>> Channels(2), 7, 1, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (6433 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/241 (358 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/242 (311 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/243 (6 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/244 (203 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/245 (207 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/246 (203 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/247 (7 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/248 (210 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/249 (207 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/250 (208 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/251 (7 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/252 (214 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/253 (207 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/254 (212 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255
>> [       OK ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/255 (7 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256
>> /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:106:
>> Failure
>> Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst, udst)) <= (threshold), actual: 255
>> vs 1
>> Size: [92 x 61]
>>
>> /home/yanwang/opencv/modules/imgproc/test/ocl/test_filter2d.cpp:107:
>> Failure
>> Expected: (TestUtils::checkNorm2(dst_roi, udst_roi)) <= (threshold),
>> actual: 255 vs 1
>> Size: [92 x 61]
>>
>> [  FAILED  ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/256, where GetParam() = (CV_8U,
>> Channels(2), 7, 4, BORDER_CONSTANT, false, false) (7413 ms)
>> [ RUN      ] OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257
>> opencv_test_imgproc: /home/yanwang/beignet/src/intel/intel_gpgpu.c:703:
>> intel_gpgpu_check_binded_buf_address: Assertion
>> `gpgpu->binded_buf[i]->offset != 0' failed.
>> Segmentation fault (core dumped)
>>
>>   But if I run OCL_ImageProc/Filter2D.Mat/257 only, it passed. I think
>> 256
>> case may influence it.
>>   Thanks.
>>
>> Yan Wang
>> _______________________________________________
>> Beignet mailing list
>> Beignet at lists.freedesktop.org
>> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
> _______________________________________________
> Beignet mailing list
> Beignet at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
>