[Beignet] [patch v2 3/3] add utest for creating 2d image from buffer.
xionghu.luo at intel.com
xionghu.luo at intel.com
Fri Aug 28 00:52:20 PDT 2015
From: Luo Xionghu <xionghu.luo at intel.com>
v2: check cl_khr_image2d_from_buffer support first;
use CL_DEVICE_IMAGE_BASE_ADDRESS_ALIGNMENT to allocate memory.
Signed-off-by: Luo Xionghu <xionghu.luo at intel.com>
---
utests/CMakeLists.txt | 1 +
utests/image_from_buffer.cpp | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 84 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 utests/image_from_buffer.cpp
diff --git a/utests/CMakeLists.txt b/utests/CMakeLists.txt
index e7a9e26..bfb902c 100644
--- a/utests/CMakeLists.txt
+++ b/utests/CMakeLists.txt
@@ -204,6 +204,7 @@ set (utests_sources
enqueue_fill_buf.cpp
builtin_kernel_max_global_size.cpp
image_1D_buffer.cpp
+ image_from_buffer.cpp
compare_image_2d_and_1d_array.cpp
compiler_fill_image_1d_array.cpp
compiler_fill_image_2d_array.cpp
diff --git a/utests/image_from_buffer.cpp b/utests/image_from_buffer.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..be5f5e6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/utests/image_from_buffer.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+#include <string.h>
+#include "utest_helper.hpp"
+#include <malloc.h>
+#include <cstring>
+
+static void image_from_buffer(void)
+{
+ size_t param_value_size;
+ std::string extensionStr;
+ OCL_CALL (clGetPlatformInfo, platform, CL_PLATFORM_EXTENSIONS, 0, 0, ¶m_value_size);
+ std::vector<char> param_value(param_value_size);
+ OCL_CALL (clGetPlatformInfo, platform, CL_PLATFORM_EXTENSIONS, param_value_size, param_value.empty() ? NULL : ¶m_value.front(), ¶m_value_size);
+ if (!param_value.empty())
+ extensionStr = std::string(¶m_value.front(), param_value_size-1);
+
+ if (!std::strstr(extensionStr.c_str(), "cl_khr_image2d_from_buffer")) {
+ return;
+ }
+
+ OCL_CALL (clGetDeviceInfo, device, CL_DEVICE_IMAGE_BASE_ADDRESS_ALIGNMENT, 0, 0, ¶m_value_size);
+ size_t base_address_alignment = 0;
+ OCL_CALL (clGetDeviceInfo, device, CL_DEVICE_IMAGE_BASE_ADDRESS_ALIGNMENT, param_value_size, &base_address_alignment, ¶m_value_size);
+ const size_t w = 512;
+ const size_t h = 512;
+ cl_image_format format;
+ cl_image_desc desc;
+ int error;
+
+ memset(&desc, 0x0, sizeof(cl_image_desc));
+ memset(&format, 0x0, sizeof(cl_image_format));
+
+ // Setup kernel and images
+ size_t buffer_sz = sizeof(uint32_t) * w * h;
+ //buf_data[0] = (uint32_t*) malloc(buffer_sz);
+ buf_data[0] = (uint32_t*)memalign(base_address_alignment, buffer_sz);
+ for (uint32_t j = 0; j < h; ++j)
+ for (uint32_t i = 0; i < w; i++)
+ ((uint32_t*)buf_data[0])[j * w + i] = j * w + i;
+
+ cl_mem buff = clCreateBuffer(ctx, CL_MEM_READ_ONLY | CL_MEM_USE_HOST_PTR, buffer_sz, buf_data[0], &error);
+
+ OCL_ASSERT(error == CL_SUCCESS);
+ format.image_channel_order = CL_RGBA;
+ format.image_channel_data_type = CL_UNSIGNED_INT8;
+ desc.image_type = CL_MEM_OBJECT_IMAGE2D;
+ desc.image_width = w;
+ desc.image_height = h;
+ desc.image_row_pitch = w * sizeof(uint32_t);
+
+ desc.buffer = 0;
+ OCL_CREATE_IMAGE(buf[0], CL_MEM_COPY_HOST_PTR, &format, &desc, buf_data[0]);
+
+ desc.buffer = buff;
+ OCL_CREATE_IMAGE(buf[1], 0, &format, &desc, NULL);
+
+ free(buf_data[0]);
+ buf_data[0] = NULL;
+
+ // Check result
+ OCL_MAP_BUFFER_GTT(0);
+ OCL_MAP_BUFFER_GTT(1);
+ for (uint32_t j = 0; j < h; ++j)
+ for (uint32_t i = 0; i < w; i++)
+ {
+ //printf("%d,%d\n", ((uint32_t*)buf_data[0])[j * w + i], ((uint32_t*)buf_data[1])[j * w + i]);
+ OCL_ASSERT(((uint32_t*)buf_data[0])[j * w + i] == ((uint32_t*)buf_data[1])[j * w + i]);
+ }
+ OCL_UNMAP_BUFFER_GTT(0);
+ OCL_UNMAP_BUFFER_GTT(1);
+
+ //spec didn't tell the sequence of release buffer of image. so release either buffer or image first is ok here.
+ //we follow the rule of destroy the bo at the last release, then the access of buffer after release image is legal
+ //and vice verse.
+#if 1
+ clReleaseMemObject(buf[1]);
+ clReleaseMemObject(buff);
+#else
+ clReleaseMemObject(buff);
+ clReleaseMemObject(buf[1]);
+#endif
+}
+
+MAKE_UTEST_FROM_FUNCTION(image_from_buffer);
--
1.9.1
More information about the Beignet
mailing list