[Beignet] [PATCH 2/2] use self test to determine enable/or disable atomics in L3 for HSW.
Yang, Rong R
rong.r.yang at intel.com
Wed Jun 17 20:37:34 PDT 2015
Can you avoid use global var atomic_test_result? It is not good manner using global var to communicate between cl and intel component.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Beignet [mailto:beignet-bounces at lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> xionghu.luo at intel.com
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2015 09:10
> To: beignet at lists.freedesktop.org
> Cc: Luo, Xionghu
> Subject: [Beignet] [PATCH 2/2] use self test to determine enable/or disable
> atomics in L3 for HSW.
>
> From: Luo Xionghu <xionghu.luo at intel.com>
>
> check the selftest kernel return value, if enqueue kernel failed, set the flag
> to not enable atomics the L3 for HSW.
>
> This reverts commit 83f8739b6fc4893fac60145326052ccb5cf653dc.
>
> Signed-off-by: Luo Xionghu <xionghu.luo at intel.com>
> ---
> src/cl_device_id.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> src/cl_utils.h | 2 ++
> src/intel/intel_defines.h | 3 +++
> src/intel/intel_gpgpu.c | 18 +++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/src/cl_device_id.c b/src/cl_device_id.c index 215f7f2..278a91c
> 100644
> --- a/src/cl_device_id.c
> +++ b/src/cl_device_id.c
> @@ -197,6 +197,7 @@ static struct _cl_device_id intel_skl_gt4_device =
> { #include "cl_gen75_device.h"
> };
>
> +int atomic_test_result = 0;
>
> LOCAL cl_device_id
> cl_get_gt_device(void)
> @@ -628,18 +629,23 @@ cl_get_device_ids(cl_platform_id platform,
>
> /* Do we have a usable device? */
> device = cl_get_gt_device();
> - if (device && cl_self_test(device)) {
> - int disable_self_test = 0;
> - // can't use BVAR (backend/src/sys/cvar.hpp) here as it's C++
> - const char *env = getenv("OCL_IGNORE_SELF_TEST");
> - if (env != NULL) {
> - sscanf(env, "%i", &disable_self_test);
> - }
> - if (disable_self_test) {
> - printf("Beignet: Warning - overriding self-test failure\n");
> - } else {
> - printf("Beignet: disabling non-working device\n");
> - device = 0;
> + if (device) {
> + int ret = cl_self_test(device);
> + if(ret != 0) {
> + if(ret == 2)
> + atomic_test_result = 1;
> + int disable_self_test = 0;
> + // can't use BVAR (backend/src/sys/cvar.hpp) here as it's C++
> + const char *env = getenv("OCL_IGNORE_SELF_TEST");
> + if (env != NULL) {
> + sscanf(env, "%i", &disable_self_test);
> + }
> + if (disable_self_test) {
> + printf("Beignet: Warning - overriding self-test failure\n");
> + } else {
> + printf("Beignet: disabling non-working device\n");
> + device = 0;
> + }
> }
> }
> if (!device) {
> diff --git a/src/cl_utils.h b/src/cl_utils.h index 28fdef6..17bb0f5 100644
> --- a/src/cl_utils.h
> +++ b/src/cl_utils.h
> @@ -312,5 +312,7 @@ static INLINE int atomic_add(atomic_t *v, const int c)
> { static INLINE int atomic_inc(atomic_t *v) { return atomic_add(v, 1); } static
> INLINE int atomic_dec(atomic_t *v) { return atomic_add(v, -1); }
>
> +extern int atomic_test_result;
> +
> #endif /* __CL_UTILS_H__ */
>
> diff --git a/src/intel/intel_defines.h b/src/intel/intel_defines.h index
> 1080a91..6ada30c 100644
> --- a/src/intel/intel_defines.h
> +++ b/src/intel/intel_defines.h
> @@ -304,6 +304,9 @@
>
> #define URB_SIZE(intel) (IS_IGDNG(intel->device_id) ? 1024 : \
> IS_G4X(intel->device_id) ? 384 : 256)
> +// HSW
> +#define HSW_SCRATCH1_OFFSET (0xB038)
> +#define HSW_ROW_CHICKEN3_HDC_OFFSET (0xE49C)
>
> // L3 cache stuff
> #define GEN7_L3_SQC_REG1_ADDRESS_OFFSET (0XB010)
> diff --git a/src/intel/intel_gpgpu.c b/src/intel/intel_gpgpu.c index
> b083dab..7257d46 100644
> --- a/src/intel/intel_gpgpu.c
> +++ b/src/intel/intel_gpgpu.c
> @@ -719,7 +719,23 @@ static void
> intel_gpgpu_set_L3_gen75(intel_gpgpu_t *gpgpu, uint32_t use_slm) {
> /* still set L3 in batch buffer for fulsim. */
> - BEGIN_BATCH(gpgpu->batch, 9);
> + if(atomic_test_result == 0)
> + {
> + BEGIN_BATCH(gpgpu->batch, 15);
> + OUT_BATCH(gpgpu->batch, CMD_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM | 1); /* length -
> 2 */
> + /* FIXME: KMD always disable the atomic in L3 for some reason.
> + I checked the spec, and don't think we need that workaround now.
> + Before I send a patch to kernel, let's just enable it here. */
> + OUT_BATCH(gpgpu->batch, HSW_SCRATCH1_OFFSET);
> + OUT_BATCH(gpgpu->batch, 0); /* enable atomic in L3 */
> + OUT_BATCH(gpgpu->batch, CMD_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM | 1); /* length -
> 2 */
> + OUT_BATCH(gpgpu->batch, HSW_ROW_CHICKEN3_HDC_OFFSET);
> + OUT_BATCH(gpgpu->batch, (1 << 6ul) << 16); /* enable atomic in L3
> */
> + }
> + else
> + {
> + BEGIN_BATCH(gpgpu->batch, 9);
> + }
> OUT_BATCH(gpgpu->batch, CMD_LOAD_REGISTER_IMM | 1); /* length - 2
> */
> OUT_BATCH(gpgpu->batch, GEN7_L3_SQC_REG1_ADDRESS_OFFSET);
> OUT_BATCH(gpgpu->batch, 0x08800000);
> --
> 1.9.1
>
> _______________________________________________
> Beignet mailing list
> Beignet at lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/beignet
More information about the Beignet
mailing list