[Beignet] [PATCH 2/8] GBE: fix safe type definition.
Zhigang Gong
zhigang.gong at intel.com
Tue Mar 31 19:05:37 PDT 2015
Should not use hard coded uint16_t for safe type definition.
Prepare to extend some types to uint32_t.
Signed-off-by: Zhigang Gong <zhigang.gong at intel.com>
---
backend/src/sys/platform.hpp | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/backend/src/sys/platform.hpp b/backend/src/sys/platform.hpp
index 173b880..803ce21 100644
--- a/backend/src/sys/platform.hpp
+++ b/backend/src/sys/platform.hpp
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ class SAFE \
{ \
public: \
INLINE SAFE(void) {} \
- explicit INLINE SAFE(uint16_t unsafe) : unsafe(unsafe) {} \
+ explicit INLINE SAFE(UNSAFE unsafe) : unsafe(unsafe) {} \
INLINE operator UNSAFE (void) const { return unsafe; } \
UNSAFE value(void) const { return unsafe; } \
private: \
--
1.9.1
More information about the Beignet
mailing list