[cairo] API Shapeup, setters and getters consistency, get vs current

[Keith Packard]

Around 17 o'clock on Feb 15, Carl Worth wrote:

> And besides, even if I'm not a fan of abbreviation, I do like shorter
> names when they are equally clear. So I propose "get" everywhere
> instead of "current".

Does that eliminate the distinction between accessors for values which are 
in the gstate and values which are not?  I like that particular 
distinction as it re-enforces what the gstate consists of right in the API 
itself.

-keith


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 228 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/cairo/attachments/20050215/b31c302f/attachment.pgp