[cairo] cacheable image representation now on a branch

[Jeff Muizelaar]

On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 09:11:56AM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> But the large-source test only uses a 20x20 source - surely Quartz is
> not failing to allocate that! Oh I think I see the issue - it attempts
> to make a CGImage large enough to accommodate the whole image and not
> just cover the region of interest - shame on Quartz for having such
> small image surfaces! (However CAIRO_STATUS_SURFACE_TOO_BIG sounds like
> a good idea and would clarify a few errors which are currently
> mis-reported as NO_MEMORY.)

I agree.

-Jeff