[cairo] Very large number of lines

necko necko opustenom at hotmail.com
Tue Aug 31 07:39:41 PDT 2010


Thank you very much for your email.
I'll try to adjust my code, and accept your suggestions.
"The question is: do all the lines you draw with cairo pass
> 
through the bounding box?"
YES. Every line I draw has to be visible. The preprocessing goes through
the input coordinates, determines min/max and prepares appropriate bounding
box. Having said that, is applying your suggestions going to be reasonable in
terms of the speedup?

I really appreciate your help.

> Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:21:20 +0200
> Subject: Re: [cairo] Very large number of lines
> From: ranma42 at gmail.com
> To: opustenom at hotmail.com
> CC: cairo at cairographics.org
> 
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 2:51 PM, necko necko <opustenom at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > Thanks for the email.
> > You were right about stroke the same line over itself. Therefore, I made a simple
> > random coordinate generator that should more closely describe the problem
> > I'm working on.
> > Note that all the lines need to be shown in the pdf file (therefore I use translate
> > which depends on min/max coordinate). The number of lines is from
> > 20million-350million. This is the main reason I'm striving for speed (in
> > processing and in displaying).
> > Therefore, displaying a PNG file would be appropriate. Please consider the
> > code below.
> > The first translate option cairo_translate (cr, -229770, 26573); leads to
> > execution time
> > of around 7min, while the second one cairo_translate (cr, -429000, 35000);
> > leads to
> > execution time of around 1min. Is it because the invisible parts are not
> > processed?
> 
> Invisible parts are faster than visible ones because they don't have to
> be composited, but they require some processing (to determine visibility).
> If your random data actually resembles your true data, consider a
> simple clipping function.
> In my attachment I get a big speedup when declaring NO_CLIP 0.
> (It does just "trivial" clipping, lines completely above/under/right/left of the
> visible region are not drawn, but there are some more lines that don't
> pass through it
> yet are not clipped with this check)
> 
> >
> > For my application, everything within the bounding box (determined by the
> > min/max coordinate) should be displayed.
> 
> That is obvious. The question is: do all the lines you draw with cairo pass
> through the bounding box?
> 
> > I noted that the output is different when stroke() every 1000th or 100000th
> > line.
> > I thought this was because of the random number generator, but I tested it
> > several times.
> 
> Don't use a variable seed. Stroking will be different because of compositing,
> but the differences in your attachments cannot be explained this way.
> Check again your output, making sure that you do not change anything else.
> (Doing the same in my attachment I cannot reproduce your problem)
> 
> I tried to do minimum changes to your original file, but I couldn't
> resist changing
> the output.
> Please play around a little with the defines in the file. You will see that:
>  - disabling clipping times get much slower
>  - rendering to pdf is not as crazy as before, since only a few thousands lines
>    are actually in the bbox (about the 0.5%)
>  - higher ITER_NOs are possible in reasonable amounts of time (image should
>    scale linearly, pdf worsen when you start swapping)
> 
> Andrea
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cairographics.org/archives/cairo/attachments/20100831/88e767e1/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the cairo mailing list