[Clipart] OpenClipart 0.04 browsable
"Áki G. Karlsson"
aki at akademia.is
Wed Jun 30 10:36:18 PDT 2004
One thought that comes to mind while browsing the images. They all have
very different document size definitions. While it is easy to zoom in and
out, it might be smoother if they were more or less similar. Should we
have a guideline about document sizes?
Here's another ad-hoc list... with some stuff we don't have yet for
illustrative purposes. From a user perspective such empty categories are
probably confusing and should not be included.
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004 09:57:03 -0700 (PDT), Bryce Harrington
<bryce at bryceharrington.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, [iso-8859-1] "Áki G. Karlsson" wrote:
>> Áki is the correct way, thank you.
>> Here's a first suggestion for an ad-hoc classification of what we've
>> got... Please tear in.
> Icons probably should go under 'Signs', below
> Hmm... clothing 'is-a' thing, so would belong under Things?
> Hmm, weather really isn't a sign is it?
> I wonder if there's a less broad term than 'thing', because pretty much
> everything in this list could be described as a thing. The items below
> except for food sound like 'property' or something... Hmmm, not sure.
> Perhaps make food a top-level category?
More information about the clipart