[Clipart] Copyrighted material appearing on the website.
chovynz at gmail.com
Tue Mar 16 20:03:17 PDT 2010
Yep. As far as I can tell, the Ubuntu logo is disqualified from public
domain. Can a Librarian please hide, remove, and/or notify the uploader of
http://www.openclipart.org/detail/31855 (has an Ubuntu logo)
On 17/03/2010 3:33 p.m., Jarod Russel wrote:
> about the ubuntu logo I found this page
> They have a trademark policy, that alone would disqualify it for OCAL
> I guess, but check for yourself.
> Am 17-Mar-10 06:22 AM, schrieb chovynz:
>> More possible copyrighted cliparts.
>> http://www.openclipart.org/detail/31855 (not sure about the Ubuntu logo)
>> http://www.openclipart.org/detail/31849 (ditto)
>> http://www.openclipart.org/detail/31489 (looks like a logo? I can't
>> read spanish and don't know where it's from.)
>> http://www.openclipart.org/detail/31483 (ditto)
>> http://www.openclipart.org/detail/31477 (ditto)
>> http://www.openclipart.org/detail/31471 (logo)
>> http://www.openclipart.org/detail/31291 (Is the OCAL logo open? this
>> is the old one.)
>> http://www.openclipart.org/detail/30973 (looks like a logo?.)
>> http://www.openclipart.org/detail/30979 (ditto)
>> On 17/03/2010 8:23 a.m., Bassel Safadi wrote:
>>> Ok Guys,
>>> Comments is added to ocal now for registered users . also users can
>>> hide there own cliparts as well as librarians.
>>> On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Oleg Koptev <koptev.oleg at gmail.com
>>> <mailto:koptev.oleg at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> so that's another screaming reason for asap introducing of
>>> comment & delete functions.
>>> I think we need to aware user(author) first, and then, if some
>>> time passed by without any reply from him - librarian should
>>> delete unsecure clipart.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the clipart