[colord] ABI break in colord 1.0.0?

[Richard Hughes]

On 7 June 2013 05:53, Christopher James Halse Rogers
<chris at cooperteam.net> wrote:
>> I didn't see the point. Nothing was using those methods outside of
>> colord as they were so new and the functionality didn't yet work
>> properly.
> Does ‘I'll need to patch it to use a Debian-specific SONAME to satisfy
> policy’ count as a sufficiently good justification? ☺

Okay, I've added the compat ABI and API on color-1-0 in
ac8fe2d92c95a1c39eebedabf85743ffbf551410 so you don't need to bump the
soname on that branch. I can roll a new release today if you want if
that fix is sufficient. I suppose I should really revert my revert and
actually bump soname for master. As an aside, you really shouldn't be
shipping master at the moment as other API breaks will happen before
the first tarball release. I'd also appreciate if you don't bump the
soname in Debian packages, as otherwise you are going to cause
yourself all kind of pain in the future and confuse people building
against the library.

Richard