[compiz] Patchs criterias
mhopf at suse.de
Mon Jun 26 03:39:30 PDT 2006
On Jun 25, 06 15:11:32 +0200, Thomas Liebetraut wrote:
> > Reading this mailing list, a few others, Gentoo & Ubuntu forums, etc.
> > it seems pretty clear to me which version the users prefer currently.
> > :-)
> Besides what Quinn already mentioned, a branch that could compete with
> upstream Xgl would need X developers that are as skilled as David
> Reveman and the other guys that work on Xgl. We currently are more
> focussing on improving Compiz.
Xgl isn't changing much lately. Seems it is pretty stable now, at least
> That's why I would appreciate informations about the patch standards,
> too, because it's somehow frustrating to know beforehand that the work
> you did during the last weeks will end up in the trash can and someone
> else rewrites your patch from scratch.
I agree that having a big picture and standards would be much
Matthias Hopf <mhopf at suse.de> __ __ __
Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ mat at mshopf.de
Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ labs www.mshopf.de
More information about the compiz