[compiz] Patchs criterias

Matthias Hopf mhopf at suse.de
Mon Jun 26 03:39:30 PDT 2006

On Jun 25, 06 15:11:32 +0200, Thomas Liebetraut wrote:
> > Reading this mailing list, a few others, Gentoo & Ubuntu forums, etc.
> > it seems pretty clear to me which version the users prefer currently.
> > :-)
> Besides what Quinn already mentioned, a branch that could compete with
> upstream Xgl would need X developers that are as skilled as David
> Reveman and the other guys that work on Xgl. We currently are more
> focussing on improving Compiz.

Xgl isn't changing much lately. Seems it is pretty stable now, at least
regarding compiz.

> That's why I would appreciate informations about the patch standards,
> too, because it's somehow frustrating to know beforehand that the work
> you did during the last weeks will end up in the trash can and someone
> else rewrites your patch from scratch.

I agree that having a big picture and standards would be much


Matthias Hopf <mhopf at suse.de>       __        __   __
Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg    (_   | |  (_   |__         mat at mshopf.de
Phone +49-911-74053-715            __)  |_|  __)  |__  labs   www.mshopf.de

More information about the compiz mailing list