[CREATE] shared resources spec

[Kai-Uwe Behrmann]

... end of brainstorm, lets criticise.

Am 06.10.05, 10:21 +0300 schrieb Nicu Buculei:

> Kai-Uwe Behrmann wrote:
> > Am 05.10.05, 14:28 -0700 schrieb Jon Phillips:
> > 
> > 
> > > On Wed, 2005-10-05 at 15:52 +0400, Alexandre Prokoudine wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > > > 1. Does everyone agree to have "art-supplies" as root directory
> > > > for
> > > > resources? It could be "create" instead, btw. It kinda confuses me
> > > > that everyone is silent on this topic :)
> > 
> > 
> > Jon: media
> 
> I don't think "media" is a proper term, /media is the place where USB devices
> are mounted by a kernel using udev, so "media" make me think at physical
> media, having two "media" directories on my computer each with different
> meaning would be confusing

agreed
 
> > Allan: create
> "create" is to me a little too authoritative, like CREATE provides those
> resources

Agreed about. Googling delivers a rock band creation facility. Not 
that bad.  www.create.org is not useful too. Result: "create" is 
meaningless for newbees.
 
> > Why not shorten "art-supplies" to "art". It seems clear that no one
> > stores art in such an /usr/... or ~/.* directory. It is much related to
> > arts.
> 
> From the proposals, I like the best "art"

... end critique; brainstorming ...

Craigs subdirectory "supplies" suggestion sounds very reasonable, as 
configuration can reside above "supplies" in whatever "art-supplies" will 
be renamed.

regards
Kai-Uwe Behrmann
                                + development for color management 
                                + imaging / panoramas
                                + email: ku.b at gmx.de
                                + http://www.behrmann.name