[CREATE] OpenRaster vs. FXG? :)
andrew at fitzsimon.com.au
Wed May 13 05:39:16 PDT 2009
wow, I'm never typing on my phone again. sorry about that.
And thanks for the clarification Leonard.
So, its a good guess that free software wont have influence in the
making of this format (for the benefit of its own features) But the
good news is its likely that if documented enough, we'll be able to
implement and translate the majority of features anyway.
we can do the 'inkscape trick' and maintain an open raster namespace
that performs advanced functionality on top of the base features of
this format. I guess then it just depends how the adobe tools end up
parsing files with attributes it doesnt recognise (should just ignore
so what's this OpenRaster vs FXG stuff... we should have both.
On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 11:54 AM, Andy Fitzsimon <andyfitz at gmail.com> wrote:
> To be fair, Adobe aquired both those properties from former developers. So
> rhe binar blobs of doom were iherited.
> Now they have a chance to do things right
> On 13/05/2009, at 11:48 AM, Hubert Figuiere <hub at figuiere.net> wrote:
>> On 05/12/2009 11:40 PM, Andy Fitzsimon wrote:
>>> Reckon there's a frantion of a chance they make this an open
>>> unrestricted standard?
>> Like Flash? Or like PSD?
More information about the CREATE