gobject signal introspection ...

[Havoc Pennington]

On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 14:28, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi there,
> 
> 	So - the attached patch goes slightly further towards somewhere useful;
> of course, until we get the glib tests working again - it's untested
> etc. but it looks correct & usefulish.
> 
> 	Comments ?
> 

This one looks good (well, apart from the mangling of my perfectly good
while loops, but I'm willing to accept for loops since I took forever to
look at the patch ;-))

Havoc