test suite failure - more detail ...

[Olivier Andrieu]

Hi,

 Havoc Pennington [Wed, 14 Apr 2004]:
 > When GetServiceOwner returns SERVICE_DOES_NOT_EXIST, we're
 > overloading that error; it would normally mean "the service you
 > invoked the method on does not exist," which is different from "the
 > service you're asking for the owner of does not exist."  It might
 > be cleaner to have DBUS_ERROR_SERVICE_HAS_NO_OWNER or something?
 > Other opinions on this?

OK

 > For bus_connection_get_base_service(), it may currently be
 > guaranteed that the first service in the list is always the base
 > service since you have to have a base service to do anything, and
 > you can never disown your base service. If so that'd be a nice
 > optimization and code savings, and I think safe as long as the test
 > suite covers the code.

Actually, I found out that BusConnectionData has a `char *name' field with the
connection's unique base service, so I'll be using that instead.

-- 
   Olivier