licensing choice [was RE: D/BUS IDL compiler ... #2 ...]
hp at redhat.com
Mon Mar 29 07:37:01 PST 2004
On Mon, 2004-03-29 at 07:13, Michael Meeks wrote:
> Hi Havoc,
> On Fri, 2004-03-26 at 11:58 -0500, Havoc Pennington wrote:
> > The hope is that a new AFL version could preserve some patent protection
> > and clarity not found in the LGPL while resolving the concerns of large
> > patent-holding companies thus getting the best of all worlds.
> I'm interested in what way the LGPL is considered unclear wrt. the
> patent issue.
If you distribute an LGPL program, are you automatically licensing all
your patents, and under what terms?
The unclarity I was referring to was broader than patents though - the
LGPL is pretty indecipherable really, though there's a widely accepted
> Interesting; clearly the sooner the better.
We'll sort it out...
More information about the dbus