license change (all contributors please follow up)

[Havoc Pennington]

On Tue, 2004-05-25 at 13:13, Joe Shaw wrote:
> 
> Does it look like new versions of the AFL will not include the patent
> clause which makes it problematic?  If we're licensing X11/LGPL anyway,
> is there any real reason to bother with the AFL in the future?

AFL is nicer than X11 license if the patent issues are resolved, I think
I left the text on why in COPYING. So the ideal is still for AFL to be
fixed up.

Havoc