match on args patch

[Havoc Pennington]

On Wed, 2005-07-27 at 15:23 -0400, John (J5) Palmieri wrote:
> 
> Havoc super hacker comes back from managment land ;-)
> 
> I'll look to adding some tests.  Why are we just matching on strings?
> Do we want to match on other basic types and marshal the match based on
> the arguments signiture at some point?

I went ahead and added some simple tests and checked this in. If it's
busted someone yell ;-)

Havoc